green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed
Criticized
State v. Whittey
See Vandebogart (DNA), 136 N.H. at 379; see also Smith v. State, 702 N.E.2d 668, 673-74 (Ind. 1998) (argument that laboratory’s techniques rendered its frequency calculations scientifically unreliable was a question of weight, not admissibility); State v. Kinder, 942 S.W.2d 313, 327 (Mo. 1996) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 854 (1997) (criticism of particular methods used to apply product rule pertain to the weight to be given the DNA evidence at trial).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
See United States v. Lewis, 110 F.3d 417, 421 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 854 , 118 S.Ct. 149 , 139 L.Ed.2d 95 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. OC
See § 874.04(2)(a)-(c). [5] In this case, O.C. was sentenced based on a second-degree felony, although the crime with which she was originally charged, attempted aggravated *950 battery to cause great bodily harm, is a third-degree felony. [6] In reaching the conclusion that section 874.04 is unconstitutional, the Fifth District distinguished People v. Gardeley, 14 Cal.4th 605 , 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 356 , 927 P.2d 713 (1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 854 , 118 S.Ct. 148 , 139 L.Ed.2d 94 (1997), a decision from the California Supreme Court rejecting constitutional challenges to California's version of…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. O.C.
See § 874.04(2)(a)-(c). 5 In this case, O.C. was sentenced based on a second-degree felony, although the crime with which she was originally charged, attempted aggravated battery to cause great bodily harm, is a third-degree felony. 6 In reaching the conclusion that section 874.04 is unconstitutional, the Fifth District distinguished People v. Gardeley, 14 Cal.4th 605 , 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 356 , 927 P.2d 713 (1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 854 , 118 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Missouri Board of Nursing Administrators
“The normal rule in a criminal case is that no negative inference from the de-‘ fendant’s failure to testify is permitted.” Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314, 327-28 , 119 S.Ct. 1307, 1314-15 , 143 L.Ed.2d 424 (1999); see also State v. Kinder, 942 S.W.2d 313, 328 (Mo. banc 1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 854 , 118 S.Ct. 149 , 139 L.Ed.2d 95 (1997).
Garcia
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-9521.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.