Ohio Forestry Ass'n v. Sierra Club, 522 U.S. 931 (1997). · Go Syfert
Ohio Forestry Ass'n v. Sierra Club, 522 U.S. 931 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hill v. United States (wied, 2000-10-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Hill v. United States
E.D. Wis. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See 4 F.3d at 551 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 931 , 118 S.Ct. 335 , 139 L.Ed.2d 260 (1997). 4 .
discussed Cited "see" Holland v. Virginia Lee Co.
W.D. Va. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Eastern Enterprises v. Chater, 110 F.3d 150 (1st Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 334 , 139 L.Ed.2d 259 (1997), and rev’d sub nom., Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 , 118 S.Ct. 2131 , 141 L.Ed.2d 451 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Santana v. Deluxe Corp.
D. Mass. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
The conclusion that Congress did not intend to cover disabled former employees among those individuals “associated with the employer in a business relationship” is drawn from the principle of construction that “ ‘[wjhere Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.’ ” Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 , 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994) (quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 , 104 S…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lee v. United States
M.D.N.C. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Pursuant to § 2679(d)(2), upon certification by the Attorney General that a federal employee was acting within the scope of employment at the time an alleged tort took place, a state-court action “shall be removed” to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (d)(2); see also Martinez v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 1 11 F.3d 1148, 1152 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 931 , 118 S.Ct. 335 , 139 L.Ed.2d 260 (1997). 3 Therefore, for purposes of removal to federal court, certification is “conclusive.” 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (d)(2) (explaining that “certification of the Attorney General shall concl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc.
v.
Sierra Club
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.