green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ashby
See, e.g., United States v. Birbal, 113 F.3d 342, 346 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S. Ct. 433 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tabone
(2×)
United States v. Triestman, 178 F.3d 624, 631 (2d Cir. 1999); see, e.g., United States v. Alton, 120 F.3d 114, 116 (8th Cir. 1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S. Ct. 433 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carroll v. State
See United States v. Espinoza, 105 F.Supp.2d 1015, 1019-21 (E.D.Wis.2000)("... the government’s position that the inevitable discoveiy doctrine trumps the exclusionary rule in cases of knock and announce violations must be rejected .... ”); see also United States v. Shugart, 889 F.Supp. 963, 976-77 (E.D.Tex.1995), aff'd, 117 F.3d 838 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S.Ct. 433 , 139 L.Ed.2d 333 (". .. it must be noted that application of the inevitable discovery doctrine to evidence seized after a clear violation of the [federal] ‘knock and announce' statute would complete…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Labare
Compare Moore v. United States, 178 F.3d 994 (8th Cir.1999) (general agency insufficient), and United States v. Birbal, 113 F.3d 342, 346 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 433 , 139 L.Ed.2d 333 (1997), with United States v. Brink, 39 F.3d 419, 423-24 (3d Cir.1994) (appearing to consider multiple factors), and Creel v. Johnson, 162 F.3d 385, 393-94 (5th Cir.1998) (same), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2027 , 143 L.Ed.2d 1038 (1999). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Benjamin Gary Triestman, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., United States v. Rico, 902 F.2d 1065, 1068-69 (2d Cir.1990) (holding that district court could correct sentence to conform to plea agreement without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause, even though defendant had already been released from prison, because defendant was still serving five-year term of supervised release) (codified, with some modifications, at Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(c), see Advisory Committee Notes to 1991 Amendment to Rule 35(c)); United States v. Smith, 115 F.3d 241, 247, 248 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 315 , 139 L.Ed.2d 244 (1997) (holding that court c…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shugart
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-6378.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1997.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.