green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kaiser
See State v. McLamb, 188 Ariz. 1, 6 , 932 P.2d 266, 271 (App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 814 , 118 S.Ct. 60 , 139 L.Ed.2d 23 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Chaudhuri v. Tennessee
See Tanford v. Brand, 104 F.3d 982, 986 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 60 , — L.Ed.2d -(1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Chaudhuri v. State of Tennessee
See Tanford v. Brand, 104 F.3d 982, 986 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 60 , 139 L.Ed.2d 23 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kessler
In certain cases, a person whose activities are not constitutionally protected may challenge a law as overbroad if it “substantially abridges the First Amendment rights of other parties not before the court.” Musser, 194 Ariz. at 32 , 977 P.2d at 132 , quoting Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens, 444 U.S. 620, 634-35 , 100 S.Ct. 826 , 63 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980); see also State v. McLamb, 188 Ariz. 1, 9 , 932 P.2d 266, 274 (App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 814 , 118 S.Ct. 60 , 139 L.Ed.2d 23 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Picciano v. Petricca
See, e.g., Alvarez-Machain v. United States, 107 F.3d 696, 701 (9th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 60 , 139 L.Ed.2d 23 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Picciano v. Petricca
See, e.g., Alvarez-Machain v. United States, 107 F.3d 696, 701 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 60 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran
See, e.g., Alvarez-Machain v. United States, 107 F.3d 696, 702 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 60 , 139 L.Ed.2d 23 (1997) (discussing Torture Victim Protection Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United States of America, Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United States
Compare Alvarez-Machain v. United States, 107 F.3d 696, 701 (9th Cir.1996) (stating a general rule that equitable tolling applies when the defendant’s wrongful conduct prevents the plaintiffs from asserting their claim or when it is impossible for the plaintiffs to file on time due to extraordinary circumstances beyond their control), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 60 , 139 L.Ed.2d 23 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McLamb
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 96-1892.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.