Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota, 522 U.S. 816 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota, 522 U.S. 816 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Breiner v. Litwhiler (pamd, 2003-02-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Breiner v. Litwhiler
M.D. Penn. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Philadelphia Housing Auth., 105 F.3d 882, 885 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 816 , 118 S.Ct. 64 , 139 L.Ed.2d 26 (1997); Pro v. Donatucci, 81 F.3d 1283, 1288 (3d Cir.1996); Watters v. City of Philadelphia, 55 F.3d 886, 892 (3d Cir.1995); Holder v. City of Allentown, 987 F.2d 188, 194 (3d Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Crosswhite v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.
E.D. Mo. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota, 104 F.3d 1017, 1021 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 816 , 118 S.Ct. 64 , 139 L.Ed.2d 26 (1997). 2.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lytle v. City of Haysville
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Green v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 105 F.3d 882, 888 (3d Cir.) (noting the strong interests favoring subpoenaed testimony because it implicates “not only the integrity of the truth seeking process and the effective administration of justice, but also the public’s interest in protecting court-ordered conduct”), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 64 (1997); Pro v. Donatucci, 81 F.3d 1283, 1291 (3d Cir. 1996) (concluding that the government had “no legitimate interest” in regulating an employee’s trial testimony and resolving Pickering balance in favor of the testifying employe…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Richard C. Lytle v. City of Haysville, Kansas, a Municipal Corporation, and James Earl Kitchings
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Green v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 105 F.3d 882, 888 (3d Cir.) (noting the strong interests favoring subpoenaed testimony because it implicates "not only the integrity of the truth seeking process and the effective administration of justice, but also the public’s interest in protecting court-ordered conduct”), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 64 , 139 L.Ed.2d 26 (1997); Pro v. Donatucci, 81 F.3d 1283, 1291 (3d Cir. 1996) (concluding that the government had "no legitimate interest” in regulating an employee’s trial testimony and resolving Pickering balance in favor of t…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cochrane v. Houston Light and Power Co.
S.D. Tex. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Sept.19, 1997)(not reported)(coneluding that an employee’s transfer constituted an adverse employment action). 8 *664 Moreover; § 2000e-2(a)(l) “reaches acts which merely “would tend’ to affect the employee; obviously, the way in which the employee may be affected in this subpart is much broader [than the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII.]” Eastman Kodak, 104 F.3d at 709 ; see also Forsyth v. City of Dallas, 91 F.3d 769, 773 (5th Cir.l996)(holding that the transfer of police officers from intelligence division to uniformed night patrol constituted a demotion), cert. denied, �…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe
v.
South Dakota
No. 96-1928.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
522 U.S. 816
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.