SRS Tech., Inc. v. Dep't of Def., 522 U.S. 1046 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
SRS Tech., Inc. v. Dep't of Def., 522 U.S. 1046 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
81 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Reyes Canada v. Rey Hernandez (prd, 2006-02-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Reyes Canada v. Rey Hernandez (2×)
D.P.R. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Diaz-Rivera v. Rivera-Rodriguez, 377 F.3d 119 (1st Cir.2004). 2 Such authority supports, at least in this instance, plaintiffs’ request to consolidate the judgment and ruling on attorney’s fees for purposes of appeal. 3 See also Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288 , 292 n. 4 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998) (holding in Section 1983 case that concurrent consideration by Magistrate-Judge of challenges to the merits and imposition of sanctions avoided piecemeal appeals and laudably conserved judicial resources as encouraged in Wh…
discussed Cited "see" Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance (2×)
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 297-98 (6th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998) (imposing monetary sanctions pursuant to § 1927 in case where Rule 11 did not apply). .
discussed Cited "see" Davis v. Bowron (2×)
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ridder v. Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 298 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
examined Cited "see" VanDanacker v. Main Motor Sales Co. (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D. Minnesota · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998); Hockley v. Shan Enterprises Limited Partnership, 19 F.Supp.2d 235 (D.N.J.1998); Photocircuits Corp. v. Marathon Agents, Inc., 162 F.R.D. 449 (E.D.N.Y.1995). 2.
discussed Cited "see" TAL Technologies, Inc. v. L.D. Rhodes Oil Co. (2×)
Okla. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Barber v. Miller, 146 F.3d 707 (9th Cir.1998) (reversing Rule 11 sanctions because the motion for sanctions was not served 21 days before filing it), Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 294-95, 297 (6th Cir.1997), cert den. 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998) (disallowed Rule 11 sanctions because defendant failed to comply with the Rule's explicit procedural prerequisite), AeroTech, Inc. v. Estes, 110 F.3d 1523, 1528-29 (10th Cir.1997) ("Because Vernon Estes did not move for Rule 11 sanctions until after AeroTech had moved to dismiss its claims against him, we …
discussed Cited "see" Shackelford v. Courtesy Ford, Inc. (2×)
D. Colo. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ridder v. Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 295-296 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. Sangiacomo N.A. Ltd.
M.D.N.C. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shakespeare Co. v. Silstar Corp. of America, Inc., 110 F.3d 234, 239 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 688 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. Gloucester Environmental Management Services, Inc.
D.N.J. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp., 104 F.3d 159, 161 (8th Cir.1997) (rejecting county’s attempt to alter emissions standard in consent decree under CERCLA by inserting more restrictive language into the air permit to comply with county ordinance); see also Clinton County Comm’rs v. USEPA, 116 F.3d 1018, 1022 (3d Cir.1997) (citizen suits challenging the remedy selected are expressly precluded “until such actions are complete, regardless of the harm that the actions might allegedly cause”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1045 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998); United States v. Akzo Coatings of America, Inc., 949 F.2…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Milliken
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Shakespeare Co. v. Silstar Corp. of America, Inc., 906 F.Supp. 997, 1002 (D.S.C.1995) (noting that the mandate is the “official mode of communicating the judgment of an appellate court to a lower court, thereby directing action to be taken or disposition to be made of the cause by the trial court”) (citation and brackets omitted), aff'd, 110 F.3d 234 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 688 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pendleton v. Central New Mexico Correctional Facility (2×)
D.N.M. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See AeroTech, Inc. v. Estes, 110 F.3d 1523, 1528-29 (10th Cir.1997) (citing Elliott v. Tilton, 64 F.3d 213, 216 (5th Cir.1995)); see also Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 296 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SRS Technologies, Inc.
v.
Department of Defense
No. 97-564.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1998.
522 U.S. 1046
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.