green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Roger Potthoff, an Individual v. William Morin, in His Individual Capacity Port Authority of the City of St. Paul, a Public Corporation
See id. at 15-19 (citing Bellows v. Amoco Oil Co., 118 F.3d 268 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1068 , 118 S.Ct. 739 , 139 L.Ed.2d 675 (1998), and Erlich v. Glasner, 418 F.2d 226 (9th Cir.1969)).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Miller Industries, Inc. Securities Litigation
See Munford, Inc. v. Valuation Research Corp., 98 F.3d 604, 611 (11th Cir. 1996), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 739 , 139 L.Ed.2d 675 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Ryans v. Gresham
See Bellows v. Amoco Oil Co., 118 F.3d 268, 274 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 118 S.Ct. 739 , 139 L.Ed.2d 675 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Dembrosky
See, e.g., Munford, Inc. v. Munford, 188 B.R. 860 (N.D.Ga.1994), rev’d in part on other grounds, 98 F.3d 604 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 739 , 139 L.Ed.2d 675 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nenno v. State
(2×)
See also, Freeman v. Case Corp., 118 F.3d 1011 , 1016 n. 6 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 739 , 139 L.Ed.2d 676 (1998)("where an expert relies on his experience and training and not a particular methodology to reach his conclusions" Daubert "analysis" is inappropriate); United States v. Bighead, 128 F.3d 1329, 1330 (9th Cir.1997)(Daubert's tests for admissibility "do not require exclusion of expert testimony that involves specialized knowledge rather than scientific theory"); Compton v. Subaru of America, 82 F.3d 1513 , 1518 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melanie Satterfield v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Accordingly, to determine whether the district court erred by denying judgment as a matter of law on the notice-adequacy, we must view the evidence and inferences in the light most favorable to Satterfield and determine whether a rational juror could conclude, pursuant to the test established by Manuel, 66 F.3d at 764 , that the information Satterfield gave Wal-Mart was “sufficient to reasonably apprise it of [Satterfield’s] request to take time off for a serious health condition.” See Fed.R.Civ.P. 50; Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374-75 (5th Cir.1969) (en banc), overruled on oth…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melissa MIGIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. PEARLE VISION, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See Patterson, 90 F.3d at 941 ; see also Bellows v. Amoco Oil Co., 118 F.3d 268 , 277 n. 28 (5th Cir.1997) (Bellows' testimony that Amoco's alleged discriminatory acts caused him to feel "less than a man" and "ruined his reputation as a man" did not, "without more", sufficiently support an award of damages for emotional harm), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 739 , 139 L.Ed.2d 675 (1998); Annis v. County of Westchester, 136 F.3d 239 (2d Cir.1998) (plaintiff's testimony that she was humiliated by the gender discrimination she endured and sought counseling for it is insufficient to warrant…
Danné Brokaw MUNFORD, of the Estate of Dillard Munford
v.
MUNFORD, INC.
v.
MUNFORD, INC.
No. 97-591.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1998.
118 S. Ct. 739
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.