green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia-Duarte
(2×)
See United States v. Harvard, 103 F.3d 412, 420 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 82 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Saldano v. Cockrell
See generally Cooper v. Taylor, 70 F.3d 1454, 1462 (4th Cir.1995) aff'd on rehearing en banc, 103 F.3d 366 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. School Administrative District No. 19
See Becerra v. Asher, 105 F.3d 1042, 1044 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 82 , 139 *67 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Lee Fisher v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Cooper v. Taylor, 103 F.3d 366, 370 (4th Cir.1996) (en banc) (noting that federal habeas review is limited to “violations of the United States Constitution or its laws and treaties”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ripellino v. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n
See e.g., Becerra v. Asher, 105 F.3d 1042, 1048 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ripellino v. SCHOOL BOARD ASS'N, INC.
(2×)
See e.g., Becerra v. Asher, 105 F.3d 1042, 1048 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 82 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Adrian Murphy
"Generally, we do not consider issues that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived in a plea agreement.” United States v. Goings, 200 F.3d 539, 543 (8th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Stuttley, 103 F.3d 684 , 686 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrew Lavern Smith v. Michael Moore, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles Condon, Attorney General, South Carolina
(2×)
It is well established that “basic principles, of federalism permit us to review only those state-court decisions that implicate federal constitutional rights.” Kornahrens v. Evatt, 66 F.3d 1350, 1357 (4th Cir.1995) (emphasis added); see also Cooper v. Taylor, 103 F.3d 366, 370 (4th Cir.1996) (en banc) (stating that federal habeas review is limited to “violations of the United States Constitution or its law and treaties”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cir.1994); United States v. Balzano, 916 F.2d 1273 (7th Cir.1990). Underlying this practice is the recognition that a criminal
See, e.g., United States v. Stuttley, 103 F.3d 684 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997); United States v. Henderson, 72 F.3d 463 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. Koff, 43 F.3d 417 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Balzano, 916 F.2d 1273 (7th Cir.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Becerra, Individually and as Next Friend of Doe, a Minor
v.
Houston Independent School District
v.
Houston Independent School District
No. 96-2052.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.