discussed Cited "see, e.g." Colwell v. State This is a corollary of the elementary rule that “States are free to provide greater protections in their criminal justice system than the Federal Constitution requires.” California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992, 1013-14 (1983). 42 State v. Fair, 502 P.2d 1150, 1152 (Or. 1972); see also Cowell v. Leapley, 458 N.W.2d 514, 517-18 (S.D. 1990) (rejecting the Teague rule of retroac-tivity as unduly narrow for state collateral review). 43 Teague, 489 U.S. at 301 . 44 Butler, 494 U.S. at 415 . 45 Lambrix v. Singletary, 520 U.S. 518, 538 (1997). 46 Teague, 489 U.S. at 311 . 47 Sawyer v. Smith, 497 U.S. 22…