cited Cited "see" United States v. Wilson See United States v. Haslip, 160 F.3d 649, 653 (10th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1044 , 119 S.Ct. 1346 , 143 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Christopherson v. Boone “A central assumption of our jurisprudence is that juries follow the instructions they receive.” United States v. Castillo, 140 F.3d 874, 884 (10th Cir.1998); see Cardall, 885 F.2d at 667 ([t]he assumption that juries can and will follow the instructions they are given is fundamental to our system of justice”) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Haslip, 160 F.3d 649, 654 (10th Cir.1998) (holding that evidence that defendant was on “life parole” and was prohibited from leaving state without parole officer’s permission was admissible to impeach defendant’s testimony that …