green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Fletcher
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 551 Pa. 258 , 710 A.2d 31, 40 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1465 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999) (holding no violation of the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination where “[t]he comments were not clearly intended to create in the minds of the jury an adverse inference from the defendant’s failure to testify as to the substance of the underlying charges; the comments were a reference to the demean- or of the witness and the testimony he presented as to his character”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rice
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 551 Pa. 258 , 710 A.2d 31 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1465 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999). [1] I agree, however, that Appellant's conviction should be affirmed. [1] The Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court was joined by Justice Castille, and Justice Newman; Justice Saylor filed a concurring opinion, joining that portion of the Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the court that pertains to the discussion of victim impact testimony herein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Bridges
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 551 Pa. 258 , 710 A.2d 31 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1465 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-Bautista
See United States v. Meyer, 157 F.3d 1067, 1079 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1465 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Williams
(2×)
See generally Commonwealth v. Clark, 551 Pa. 258, 283 , 710 A.2d 31, 43 (1998)(finding that the Commonwealth's proffer of two prior robbery convictions constituted sufficient evidence to support a capital sentencing jury's finding of the (d)(9) aggravator), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 1465 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smith, Shawna L.
See also United States v. Meyer, 157 F.3d 1067, 1081-82 (7th Cir. 1998), cert. denied 119 S.Ct. 1465 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shawna Leanne Smith
See also United States v. Meyer, 157 F.3d 1067, 1081-82 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1465 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hobbs v. USA
See, e.g., Lake v. Rubin, 162 F.3d 113 , 115— 16 (D.C.Cir.1998) (holding that § 6103, although not framed as an express exception to the Privacy Act, provides the exclusive statutory route for taxpayers to access their tax records), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1465 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999); Cheek v. IRS, 703 F.2d 271, 272 (7th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (holding that § 6103 is exclusive to both the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act); Gardner v. United States, Civ.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lake et ux.
v.
Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury
v.
Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury
No. 98-1508.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1999.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.