Hoke v. Stewart, 526 U.S. 1074 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Hoke v. Stewart, 526 U.S. 1074 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Whalen v. Randle (ca6, 2002-03-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Whalen v. Randle
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 810-12 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1074 , 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999); Miller v. New Jersey Dep’t of Corr., 145 F.3d 616, 616-18 (3rd Cir.1998); Miller v. Marr, 141 F.8d 976, 978 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 891 , 119 S.Ct. 210 , 142 L.Ed.2d 178 (1998); Calderon v. U.S. District Court, 128 F.3d 1283, 1288-89 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1061 , 118 S.Ct. 1389 , 140 L.Ed.2d 648 (1998), Lindh v. Murphy, 96 F.3d 856, 866 (7th Cir.1996), rev’d on other grounds, 521 U.S. 320 , 117 S.Ct. 2059 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Alexander v. Johnson
S.D. Tex. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Villegas v. Johnson, 184 F.3d 467, 468 (5th Cir.1999); see Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806 , 809 n. 4 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1074 , 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Brown v. Cain
E.D. La. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1074 , 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Banks v. Johnson
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 812 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Felder v. Johnson (2×)
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 , (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 1474 (1999) (equitable tolling appropriate in "rare and exceptional circumstances" where equity demands it); Coleman, 184 F.3d at 402 (equitable tolling is limited to circumstances where plaintiff is misled by defendant or "prevented in some extraordinary way from asserting his rights"); Calderon v. United States Dist.
discussed Cited "see" Shaw v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (2×)
E.D. Tex. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999).
cited Cited "see" FELTUS TAYLOR, JR v. BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 812 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999); Drinkard, 97 F.3d at 768 .
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DWAYNE MARSHALL
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 809 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999); United States v. Carter, 117 F.3d 262 , 264 n.1 (5th Cir. 1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Torabi v. Gonzales
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Borges v. Gonzales, 402 F.3d 398, 406 (3d Cir.2005) (following the Ninth Circuit’s determination to apply equitable tolling to motions to reopen, and additionally noting that “[t]he First, Second, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits have more generally considered applying, or have applied, equitable tolling to motions to reopen”); Iavorski v. INS, 232 F.3d 124, 132 (2d Cir.2000) (concluding that the 90-day period to file a motion to reopen is not jurisdictional and thus is subject to equitable tolling); see also Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir.1998) (explaining that, because the …
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lookingbill v. Johnson
S.D. Tex. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Villegas v. Johnson, 184 F.3d 467, 468 (5th Cir.1999); see also Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806 , 809 n. 4 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1074 , 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Riley v. Snider
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir.1998) (equitable tolling appropriate only "in rare and exceptional circumstances"), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999); Miller v. New Jersey State Dept. of Corrections, 145 F.3d 616, 618-19 (3d Cir. 1998) (equitable tolling applies only where prisoner has diligently pursued claims, but has in some "extraordinary way" been prevented from asserting his rights).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bates v. Jordan
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Miller , 141 F.3d at 978 (indicating that equitable tolling principles apply only where a prisoner has diligently pursued his federal habeas claims); see also Davis v. Johnson , 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir. 1998) (AEDPA’s one-year limitation period will be equitably tolled only “in rare and exceptional circumstances”), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Warren v. United States
S.D. Ohio · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806 *822 (5th Cir.1998), cert denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999); Miller v. New Jersey State Dep’t. of Corrections, 145 F.3d 616 (3d Cir.1998) (“Mil ler”); Miller v. Marr, 141 F.3d 976 (10th Cir.), cert. denied,— U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 210 , 142 L.Ed.2d 173 (1998) (“Man”); Calderon v. United States Dist.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davis v. Madrid
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Miller v. Marr, 141 F.3d at 978 ; see also Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir. 1998) (stating that AEDPA’s one-year limitations period will be equitably tolled only “in rare and exceptional circumstances”), cert. denied, U.S. , 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999); Miller v. New Jersey Dep’t of Corrections, 145 F.3d 616, 618-19 (3d Cir. 1998) (noting that equitable tolling applies only where prisoner has diligently pursued claims but has in some “extraordinary way” been prevented from asserting his rights).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Douglas v. Scott
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Miller, we indicated that equitable tolling principles apply only where a prisoner has diligently pursued his federal habeas claims. 141 F.3d at 978 ; see also Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir. 1998) (AEDPA’s one-year limitation period will be equitably tolled only “in rare and exceptional circumstances”), cert. denied, 119 S.Ct. 1474 (1999); Miller v. New Jersey State Dept. of Corrections, 145 F.3d 616, 618-19 (3d Cir. 1998) (equitable tolling applies only where prisoner has diligently pursued claims, but has in some “extraordinary way” been prevented from asserting h…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reed v. Gibson
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Miller , we indicated that equitable tolling principles apply only where a prisoner has diligently pursued his federal habeas claims. 141 F.3d at 978 ; see also Davis v. Johnson , 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir. 1998) (AEDPA’s one-year limitation period will be equitably tolled only “in rare and exceptional circumstances”), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999); Miller v. New Jersey State Dept. of Corrections , 145 F.3d 616, 618-19 (3d Cir. 1998) (equitable tolling applies only where prisoner has diligently pursued claims, but has in some “extraordinary way” been prevented from assert…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McLester v. Hopper
M.D. Ala. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999); Miller v. Marr, 141 F.3d 976 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 210 , 142 L.Ed.2d 173 (1998) (“Marr”); Miller v. New Jersey State Dep’t of Corrections, 145 F.3d 616 (3d Cir.1998) (“Miller ”); Calderon v. United States Dist.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. Lytle
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Miller v. Marr , 141 F.3d 976, 978 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 210 (1998); see also Davis v. Johnson , 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir. 1998) (holding that one-year limitation period of AEDPA will be equitable tolled “in rare and exceptional circumstances”), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 1474 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hoke
v.
Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
No. 98-8168.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1999.
526 U.S. 1074
Published

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.