green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Stella, Marie v. v. Mineta, Norman Y.
But see Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 905 (4th Cir.1998) (“In order to make out a prima facie case of discriminatory termination, a plaintiff must ordinarily show that the position ultimately was filled by someone not a member of the protected class.”), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1099 , 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Cloud v. Pfizer Inc.
See Kennedy v. Collagen Corp., 161 F.3d 1226, 1230 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1099 , 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Bravo Energy Trading, N.A. v. Shell Oil Co.
See Kennedy v. Collagen Corp., 161 F.3d 1226, 1227 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1099 , 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pivirotto v. Innovative Systems, Inc.
See Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 905 (4th Cir. 1998) ("In order to make out a prima facie case of discriminatory termination, a plaintiff must ordinarily show that the position ultimately was filled by someone not a member of the protected class."), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1577 (1999). __________________________________________ We also find guidance in the Supreme Court's decision on a related issue in O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patricia M. Pivirotto v. Innovative Systems, Inc
See Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 905 (4th Cir.1998) ("In order to make out a prima facie case of discriminatory termination, a plaintiff must ordinarily show that the position ultimately was filled by someone not a member of the protected class."), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mittman v. Casey (In Re Casey)
See also Schmidt v. Goscicki (In re Goscicki), 207 B.R. 893, 896 (9th Cir. BAP 1997)(“The adversary proceeding cover sheet was insufficient to operate as a complaint to determine dischargeability.”), aff'd., 162 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1099 , 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. PEMBERTON TP. SCHOOLS
See, e.g., Brown v. McLean, 159 F. 3d 898, 905 (4th Cir.1998) (holding that male, replaced by another male, could not make out a prima facie case of gender discrimination), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed. 2d 672 (1999); Chock v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 113 F. 3d 861 , 863 n. 1 (8th Cir.1997) (ruling that it does "not require a plaintiff to demonstrate replacement by a person outside any protected class for a prima facie case"); Carson v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 82 F. 3d 157, 159 (7th Cir.1996) (announcing that "[t]hat one's replacement is of another race, sex, or age ..…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Curtis Westberry, and Connie Rena Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi Ab, and Mataki Kemi Ab, Connie Rena Westberry, and James Curtis Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi Ab, and Mataki Kemi Ab
Compare Heller, 167 F.3d at 154, 156-57 (concluding that a proper differential diagnosis is adequate to support expert medical opinion on causation), Kennedy v. Collagen Corp., 161 F.3d 1226, 1228-30 (9th Cir.1998) (holding district court abused its discretion in excluding an expert opinion on causation based upon a reliable differential diagnosis), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 1577 , --- L.Ed. 2d ----(1999), Baker, 156 F.3d at 252-53 (determining that a differential diagnosis rendered expert opinion on causation sufficiently reliable for admission), Zuchowicz v. United States, 140 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi AB
Compare Heller, 167 F.3d at 154, 156-57 (concluding that a proper differential diagnosis is adequate to support expert medical opinion on causation), Kennedy v. Collagen Corp., 161 F.3d 1226, 1228-30 (9th Cir. 1998) (holding district court abused its discretion in excluding an expert opinion on causation based upon a reliable differential diagnosis), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999), Baker, 156 F.3d at 252-53 (determining that a differential diagnosis rendered expert opinion on causation sufficiently reliable for admission), Zuchowicz v. United States, 140 F.3d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marilyn SCHMIDT
v.
Thomas A. GOSCICKI and Alfred Siegel, Trustee
v.
Thomas A. GOSCICKI and Alfred Siegel, Trustee
No. 98-1408.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1999.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.