green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“e hold that the decision of the nation to terminate the employment of a community 811 health nurse was an 'internal tribal matter' within the meaning of the settlement act .”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gallegos v. Jicarilla Apache
e hold that the decision of the nation to terminate the employment of a community 811 health nurse was an 'internal tribal matter' within the meaning of the settlement act .
cited
Cited "see"
Penobscot Nation v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
See Penobscot Nation v. Fellencer, 164 F.3d 706, 708 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1022, 119 S.Ct. 2367 , 144 L.Ed.2d 771 (1999); Akins v. Penobscot Nation, 130 F.3d 482, 485 (1st Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoult v. Hoult (In Re Hoult)
See Hoult v. Hoult, 157 F.3d 29 (1st Cir.1998), cert. denied — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 2367 , 144 L.Ed.2d 772 (1999), quoting Dennis v. Rhode Island Hosp.
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Madison School District No. 321
See Ruiz v. City of Santa Maria, 160 F.3d 543, 549 (9th Cir.1998) (“Generally, an action is moot when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2367 , - L.Ed.2d - (1999); Lindquist v. Idaho State Bd. of Corrections, 776 F.2d 851, 853-54 (9th Cir.1985) (“A case, or an issue in a case, is considered moot if it has lost its character as a present, live controversy of the kind that must exist if we are to avoid advisory opinions on abstra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Karuk Tribe Housing Authority, Opinion
See, e.g., Penobscot Nation v. Fellencer, 164 F.3d 706, 709-11 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1022 , 119 S.Ct. 2367 , 144 L.Ed.2d 771 (1999) (tribe not subject to a state anti-discrimination statute in discharging a non-Indian from position as nurse in tribe-run health center); Pink v. Modoc Indian Health Project, Inc., 157 F.3d 1185, 1188 (9th Cir.1998) (Indian has no cause of action under Title VII against a tribal non-profit entity which “served as an arm of the sovereign tribes, acting as more than a mere business”); Great Lakes, 4 F.3d at 494-96 (“it has been traditional to leav…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission Ex Rel. Edmonson v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
See eg., City of Auburn v. U.S. Government, 154 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied 527 U.S. 1022 , 119 S.Ct. 2367 , 144 L.Ed.2d 771 (1999) (application of state environmental regulations could interfere with or prevent the reopening of an entire railroad line); Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. v. Anderson, 959 F.Supp. 1288 (D.Mont.1997) (applying state or local regulations could have prevented railroad's closure of railroad depots located on railroad property and staffed by railroad employees); CSX Transp.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fellencer
v.
Penobscot Nation
v.
Penobscot Nation
No. 98-1690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.