green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.1 score
“singleton ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson
singleton ii
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orange
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Hodges
See Ex parte Hutcherson, 727 So.2d 861 *941 (Ala.1998) (murder especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel when victim was beaten to death), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hodges v. State
See Ex parte Hutcherson, 727 So.2d 861 (Ala.1998) (murder especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel when victim was beaten to death), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lennox Linval Roper
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McCullough
See U.S. v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Franky-Ortiz
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297, 1298 (10th Cir.1999) (en banc) (Singleton II), cert, denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Estate of Mater
See U. S. v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297, 1302 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 527 U.S. 1024 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 (1999) (“Congress is understood to legislate against a background of common-law adjudicatory principles.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Ex parte Hutcherson, 727 So.2d 861 (Ala.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999); Ashley v. State, 651 So.2d 1096 (Ala.Cr.App.1994); McGahee v. State, 632 So.2d 976 (Ala.Cr.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Hunter Mauney
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir. 1999) (en banc), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 2371 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James D. Marks (98-6044), Maurice Navarro Brooks (98-6048), Robert Lee Aguon (98-6216)
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Owusu
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Singleton, Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1151 (1996). 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 2371 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Y. Owusu (98-3356), Larry Latham (98-3847), and Anthony Latham (98-3850)
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salemme
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 , 1302 n. 2 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999) ("It is inconceivable that any court would hold that a prosecutor who pays for the false testimony of a witness is carrying out an official function of the government” as required by § 201). 71 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Crosby
See U.S. v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10 Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. denied, Singleton v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael G. Albanese
See 18 U.S.C. § 201 (c)(2). -8- Tenth Circuit in Singleton v. United States, 144 F.3d 1343 (10th Cir. 1998), opinion vacated and rehearing granted, 144 F.3d 1361 (10th Cir. July 10, 1999) (en banc), on rehearing, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 2371 (1999), that the Government violated § 201(c)(2) and that this violation requires the exclusion of Bartels' testimony.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy R. Fairchild, United States of America v. Jeffrey Paul Gruber, Also Known as No Mind, Also Known as the King, Also Known as Boss
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297, 1299-1302 (10th Cir. 1999) (en banc), cert. denied, U.S., 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy R. Fairchild
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297, 1299-1302 (10th Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rutilio Garcia-Sanchez, A.K.A. Jose
See United States v. Singleton, 144 F.3d 1343 (1998), rev’d en banc, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carletos E. Hardamon, Also Known as Cj
See United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Bey, Jr.
See generally United States v. Singleton, 144 F.3d 1343 (10th Cir.1998), rev ’d, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Brown
See United States v. Singleton, 144 F.3d 1343, 1343 (10th Cir.1998), rev’d en banc, United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297, 1298, 1302 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 2372, — L.Ed.2d -(1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
See also Hutcherson v. State, 727 So.2d 846 (Ala.Crim.App.1997), aff'd, 727 So.2d 861 (Ala.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See also Hutcherson v. State, 727 So.2d 846 (Ala.Cr.App.1997), aff'd, 727 So.2d 861 (Ala.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See also Hutcherson v. State, 727 So.2d 846 (Ala.Cr.App.1997), aff'd, 727 So.2d 861 (Ala.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Centennial Management Services, Inc. v. Axa Re Vie
See, e.g., United States v. Singleton, 144 F.3d 1343, 1347 (10th Cir.1998) (contracts to pay fact witnesses are void as violative of public policy), vacated on other grounds, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Ervin
(2×)
As he now acknowledges, the court of appeals ordered a rehearing in bank within days of the original decision and has ruled in U.S. v. Singleton (10th Cir. 1999) 165 F.3d 1297 , “that Congress did not intend the federal statute to invade the well-established prerogative of the sovereign to offer leniency in exchange for a witness’s testimony.” (People v. Maldonado (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 588, 595, fn. 3 [ 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 898 ]; see also U.S. v. Condon (7th Cir. 1999) 170 F.3d 687, 689-690 .) The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Singleton (Singleton v. United States (1999) 52…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gillespie v. City Of Indianapolis
See, e.g., United States v. Wilson, 159 F.3d 280, 286-87 (7th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S.Ct. 2371 (1999). 5 The Indianapolis Police Department itself has concluded that Gillespie can no longer carry a firearm.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Taylor
See Singleton, 144 F.3d at 1361-62 (order); see also United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir.1999) (en bane), cert. denied - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , - L.Ed.2d. - (1999) (No. 98-8758).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis
See, e.g., United States v. Wilson, 159 F.3d 280, 286-87 (7th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , - L.Ed.2d - (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pride
See also, U.S. v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297 (10 th Cir. en banc 1999), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2371 , 144 L.Ed.2d 775 , (court en banc rejected similar argument and found agreement with prosecutor was not against public policy).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartline
v.
Hambrick
v.
Hambrick
No. 98-8964.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.