green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536 , 540 n. 2 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); see also United States v. Malpeso, 115 F.3d 155 , 159 n. 1, 164 (2d Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gregory Ferguson, AKA \Black Greggo
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536 , 540 n. 2 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); see also United States v. Malpeso, 115 F.3d 155 , 159 n. 1, 164 (2d Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricardo Morales, AKA \Ichi
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536, 539 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
Thus, the motive requisite is satisfied if “ ‘the jury could properly infer that the defendant committed his violent crime because he knew it was expected of him by reason of his membership in the enterprise or that he committed it in furtherance of that membership.’ ” Id.; see United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536, 540 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); United States v. Locascio, 6 F.3d 924, 940 (2d Cir.1993). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
Thus, the motive requisite is satisfied if " 'the jury could properly infer that the defendant committed his violent crime because he knew it was expected of him by reason of his membership in the enterprise or that he committed it in furtherance of that membership.' " Id.; see United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536, 540 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); United States v. Locascio, 6 F.3d 924, 940 (2d Cir.1993). 1.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mascheroni
v.
Regents of the University of California
v.
Regents of the University of California
No. 98-844.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1999.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.