green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“when infringement is found to be willful, the district court should give extra scrutiny to the categories of overhead expenses claimed by the infringer to insure that each category is directly and validly connected to the sale and production of the infringing product.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. Collezione Europa, USA, Inc.
when infringement is found to be willful, the district court should give extra scrutiny to the categories of overhead expenses claimed by the infringer to insure that each category is directly and validly connected to the sale and production of the infringing product.
cited
Cited "see"
Sadhu Singh Hamdad Trust v. Ajit Newspaper Advertising, Marketing & Communications, Inc.
See Hamil America Inc. v. GFI, 193 F.3d 92, 99 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1160 , 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1080 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Havis v. Norman (In Re Equator Corp.)
See Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 185 F.3d 496 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1160 , 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1080 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Sommers v. Vaught (In Re Wilson)
See Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 185 F.3d 496 (5th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1160 , 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1080 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Northern Tier Solid Waste Authority v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue
See Wilson Partners, L.P. v. Commonwealth, 723 A.2d 1079 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999), aff’d, 558 Pa. 462 , 737 A.2d 1215 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1159 , 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1080 (2000). .
cited
Cited "see"
West v. Family Express Corp. (In Re Bilstat, Inc.)
See Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 185 F.3d 496 (5th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1160 , 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1080 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Sentry Operating Co. v. Billings (In Re Sentry Operating Co. of Texas, Inc.)
See Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 185 F.3d 496 (5th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1160 , 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1080 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Yurman Design, Inc. v. Paj, Inc.
See Hamil America, Inc. v. GFI, 193 F.3d 92, 98 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1080 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
DIANA LYN GAMBOA; LINDA D. SLUSSER v. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, U.S. Postmaster General
See id.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lester Associates v. Commonwealth
See also Wilson Partners, L.P. v. Commonwealth, 723 A.2d 1079 (Pa.Cmwlth.) aff'd, 558 Pa. 462 , 737 A.2d 1215 (1999), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1171 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1180 (2000) (the Court reiterated the law that realty transfer tax is a tax upon a transaction, which is the transfer of title to real estate as evidenced by a document to be recorded).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
v.
Rushing et ux.
v.
Rushing et ux.
No. 99-1090.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: M.D. North Carolina (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.