Mackay v. Comm'r of Patents & Trademarks, 529 U.S. 1027 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Mackay v. Comm'r of Patents & Trademarks, 529 U.S. 1027 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Garfinkle (ca10, 2001-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Garfinkle
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1186 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1027 , 120 S.Ct. 1438 , 146 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Brown v. Gibson
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1189 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1027 , 120 S.Ct. 1438 , 146 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Tillman v. Cook
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1183 (10th Cir.1999), cert. de nied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 1438 , 146 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Plantz v. Massie
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1189 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 1438 (2000).
cited Cited "see" James v. Gibson
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1191 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1438 , 146 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Van Woudenberg Ex Rel. Foor v. Gibson
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1191 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1438 , 146 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. Everett
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1187 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 1438 (2000). -6- Finally, Mr. Harris argues that he was denied due process because the federal habeas form which he used instructed him to state his position “without citing legal authority or argument.” “By following the district court rules, Appellant was not allowed to use legal argument or legal authority in support of his claims . . . yet the district court dismissed Appellant’s petition because he did not use legal argument and legal authority to support his claim.” Pet.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Martinez v. Tafoya
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Patel v. United States, 19 F.3d 1231, 1237 (7th Cir.1994) (holding no prejudice to petitioner who failed to make specific, affirmative showing that absent witness’s testimony would have affected outcome of trial); see also Foster v. Ward, 182 F.3d 1177, 1185 (10th Cir.1999) (concluding that defense counsel’s failure to contact or investigate alibi witnesses insufficient to establish prejudice), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1027 , 120 S.Ct. 1438 , 146 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mackay
v.
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
No. 99-7995.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 2000.
529 U.S. 1027
Published

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.