green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.2 score
“while a jury must agree on all of the elements of an offense, it need not agree on the means by which all the elements were accomplished.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Albert Verrecchia
while a jury must agree on all of the elements of an offense, it need not agree on the means by which all the elements were accomplished.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
(2×)
See generally United States v. Reeder, 170 F.3d 93, 106 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999); United States v. Rakes, 136 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1998). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stovall
See Un ited States v. H ill, 167 F.3d 1055, 1070-71 (6th C ir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 872 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lela Stovall
See United States v. Hill, 167 F.3d 1055, 1070-71 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 872, 120 S.Ct. 175 , 145 L.Ed.2d 148 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anna Roach v. Vallen Safety Supply
(2×)
See Berg v. No-rand Corp., 169 F.3d 1140, 1145 (8th Cir.), *713 cert, denied, 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Abdul Majid Bala, Also Known as Sealed 2, Kantilal Patel, Also Known as Sealed 1
(2×)
See United States v. Caban, 173 F.3d 89 , 93 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999); United States v. Gomez, 103 F.3d 249, 256 (2d Cir.1997); United States v. Knecht, 55 F.3d 54, 57 (2d Cir.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruben Feliciano, AKA Rude Dog, AKA Roob Dog, Ronald Pagan, AKA Twin, and Nelson Gonzalez, AKA Snoop,defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Caban, 173 F.3d 89, 94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard E. Graham v. Contract Transport
See Berg v. Norand Corp., 169 F.3d 1140, 1145 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Graham v. Contract Transportation, Inc.
See Berg v. Norand Corp., 169 F.3d 1140, 1145 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 174 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marsh v. Hog Slat, Inc.
See Berg v. Norand Corp., 169 F.3d 1140, 1146 (8th Cir.) (plaintiffs affidavit was “conclusory,” and thus insufficient to defeat summary judgment on an Equal Pay Act claim, as to the plaintiffs comparison of herself with male managers, because she failed to articulate which particular male managers had jobs similar to hers, or how the males compared in experience, education, and training), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999); Pony Computer, Inc. v. Equus Computer Sys. of Mo., Inc., 162 F.3d 991 , 997 (8th Cir.1998) (affidavits asserting disclosure of confidential…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Mannis
See Berg v. Norand Corp., 169 F.3d 1140, 1145 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 174 , — L.Ed.2d - (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nicolo
Sept. 25, 2008); accord United States v. Evanson, No. 2:05 CR 00805, 2008 WL 3107332 , at *3 (D.Utah Aug. 4, 2008); see, e.g., United States v. Zvi, 168 F.3d 49, 52 (2d Cir.) (permitting forfeiture of funds legitimately obtained through defendants’ sale of gold jewelry prior to the commission of fraud *347 involving faked robbery of jewelry store, because “[t]he proceeds from the pre-rob-bery sale of gold represented the defendants’ take from the scheme”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S.Ct. 176 , 145 L.Ed.2d 148 (1999) With respect to forfeiture of fraud proceeds under § 981, then…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jennings
See State v. Salmonese, supra, 352 F.3d 622 ; see also United States v. Ben Zvi, 168 F.3d 49 , 54—55 (2d Cir.) (holding that addition, after limitations period had passed, of sixteen counts of money laundering to charge of scheme to defraud substantially amended original indictment), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S. Ct. 176 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. United States
(2×)
See also Vardanega v. Internal Revenue Service, 170 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir.), cert, denied 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999), (“the purpose of the United States’ right of redemption was to prevent foreclosure purchasers from buying real property for less than the fair market value, selling the property, and keeping the profit.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bones v. Honeywell International, Inc.
(2×)
See also Berg v. Norand Corp., 169 F.3d 1140, 1145 (8th Cir.) (suffering from continuous joint pain is not substantially limiting on the major life activity of working), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S.Ct. 174 , 145 L.Ed.2d 147 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles E. Rashid (99-2141) Jack Rashid (99-2494)
See e.g., United States v. Hill, 167 F.3d 1055 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 872 , 120 S.Ct. 175 , 145 L.Ed.2d 148 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Berg
v.
Norand Corp.
v.
Norand Corp.
No. 99-76.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.