Robert Bogetti & Sons v. Bank of Am., 120 S. Ct. 402 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Robert Bogetti & Sons v. Bank of Am., 120 S. Ct. 402 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Keith R. Meyer v. City of Joplin (ca8, 2002-04-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Keith R. Meyer v. City of Joplin
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). “[Wjhere no such interest exists, there can be no due process violation.” Singleton v. Cecil, 176 F.3d 419 , 424 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 966 , 120 S.Ct. 402 , 145 L.Ed.2d 313 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Kurt Rogerson v. Hot Springs Advertising and Promotion Commission and Charles Rixse
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Singleton v. Cecil, 176 F.3d 419 , 421-22 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 966 , 120 S.Ct. 402 , 145 L.Ed.2d 313 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Whitten v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Singleton v. Cecil, 176 F.3d 419 , 424-25 & n. 6 (8th Cir.) (finding that an at-will employee has no property interest in job), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 966 , 120 S.Ct. 402 , 145 L.Ed.2d 313 (1999); Ball v. Ark.
discussed Cited "see" Mercer v. City of Cedar Rapids
N.D. Iowa · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Singleton v. Cecil, 176 F.3d 419, 425-29 (8th Cir.1999) (reading Supreme Court precedent to suggest that there is no “substantive” due process protection for public employees), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 402 , 145 L.Ed.2d 313 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sandra K. Dunham v. George Wadley
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); see also Singleton v. Cecil, 176 F.3d 419, 421-22 (8th Cir.1999) (en banc), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 402 , — L.Ed.2d - (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROBERT BOGETTI & SONS
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.T. & S.A.
No. 99-384.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1999.
120 S. Ct. 402
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.