green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberto v. Ortiz v. Eric K. Shinseki
The claimant must provide some degree of specificity as to what the alleged error is, and, unless it is the kind of error that, if true, would be CUE on its face, “persuasive reasons must be given as to why the result would have been manifestly different but for the alleged error.” Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 44 (1993) (emphasis in original); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380-81 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999) (adopting this Court’s interpretation of 38 C.F.R. § 3.105 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert J. Ingram v. R. James Nicholson
The claimant must provide some degree of specificity as to what the alleged error is and, unless it is the kind of error that, if true, would be CUE on its face, “persuasive reasons must be given as to why the result would have been manifestly different but for the alleged error.” Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 44 (1993); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380-81 (Fed.Cir.1999) (adopting this Court’s *242 interpretation of 38 C.F.R. § 3.105 ), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roderick C. Stallworth v. R. James Nicholson
The claimant must provide some degree of specificity as to what the alleged error is and, unless it is the kind of error that, if true, would be CUE on its face, “persuasive reasons must be given as to why the result would have been manifestly different but for the alleged error.” Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 44 (1993); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380-81 (Fed.Cir.1999) (adopting this Court’s interpretation of 38 C.F.R. § 3.105 ), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert J. Ingram v. R. James Nicholson
The claimant must provide some degree of specificity as to what the alleged error is and, unless it is the kind of error that, if true, would be CUE on its face, “persuasive reasons must be given as to why the result would have been manifestly different but for the alleged error.” Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 44 (1993); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380-81 (Fed.Cir.1999) (adopting this Court’s interpretation of 38 C.F.R. § 3.105 ), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delhomme v. Caremark Rx Inc.
Proc. 12(b); see also, Prager v. LaFaver, 180 F.3d 1185, 1188-89 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999) (court has discretion to consider extrinsic materials submitted in conjunction with a Rule 12(b)(6) motion but is not required to do so).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burdett Huston v. Anthony J. Principi
Russell, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1999) (expressly adopting the “manifestly changed the outcome” *401 language in Russell, supra), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Busey v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS, COUNTY, SHAWNEE, KS
See also Prager v. LaFaver, 180 F.3d 1185, 1190 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999); Hogan v. City of Independence, Kansas, 2003 WL 21685907 , *6 (D.Kan.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burdett Huston v. Anthony J. Principi
Russell, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378,1380 (Fed.Cir.1999) (expressly adopting the “manifestly changed the outcome” language in Russell, supra), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simmons v. Principi
Russell, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1999) (expressly adopting the “manifestly changed the outcome” language in Russell, supra), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carpenter v. Principi
See Russell, 3 Vet.App. at 313-14 (holding that CUE is "the sort of error which, had it not been made, would have manifestly changed the outcome”); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1999) (expressly adopting the "manifestly changed the outcome” language in Russell, supra ), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simmons v. Gober
Russell, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1999) (expressly adopting the “manifestly changed the outcome” language in Russell, supra), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 *88 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herring v. Keenan
(2×)
See also Prager v. LaFaver, 180 F.3d 1185, 1191-92 (10th Cir. 1999) (balance in favor of plaintiff should have been anticipated by officials and thus their qualified immunity was abrogated), cert. denied 120 S. Ct. 405 ; Medina, 960 F.2d at 1498 ("[C]onduct may be so egregious that a reasonable person would know it to be unconstitutional even though it is judged by a balancing test.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cole v. West
Russell, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc); see also Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1999) (expressly adopting the “manifestly changed the outcome” language in Russell, supra), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 405 , 145 L.Ed.2d 315 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trinidad BUSTOS
v.
Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
v.
Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 99-443.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1999.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.