Vail v. United States, 528 U.S. 827 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Vail v. United States, 528 U.S. 827 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (61 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Barrow, J. (pasuperct, 2020-09-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Barrow, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Freeman, 827 A.2d 385, 405 (Pa. 2003), citing Commonwealth v. Baez, 720 A.2d 711, 726 (Pa. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Lawrence, B.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See -9- J-S53007-18 Commonwealth v. Baez, 720 A.2d 711, 734 (Pa. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Rouner, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Baez, 720 A.2d 711, 722 (Pa. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Reyes, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. McBride, A.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Freeman, 573 Pa. 532 , 827 A.2d 385 , 405 (2003) (citing Commonwealth v. Baez, 554 Pa. 66 , 720 A.2d 711, 726 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999)). -4- J-S47010-15 Commonwealth v. Lowry, 55 A.3d 743, 753 (Pa. Super. 2012) citing Commonwealth v. Malloy, 856 A.2d 767 , 776 (2004); see also Commonwealth v. Faraci, 466 A.2d 2228 , (Pa. Super. 1983) (internal citations omitted) (“Once photographs are proffered as evidence, the trial judge must first determine whether they are inflammatory; if not, then whether they are admissible depends e…
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Lowry
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Freeman, 573 Pa. 532 , 827 A.2d 385, 405 (2003) (citing Commonwealth v. Baez, 554 Pa. 66 , 720 A.2d 711, 726 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999)).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ridley
D. Kan. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rith, 164 F.3d 1323, 1330 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999) (suggesting a normative inquiry into whether the relationship between the residents and third-party occupiers creates a presumption of control over the property for most purposes by the third party).
discussed Cited "see" In RE STATE (STATE v. Johanson (2×)
N.H. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 16.1(h), at 506 (1999); see United States v. LiCausi, 167 F.3d 36, 44 (1st Cir.) (“It is settled beyond peradventure that venue is a personal privilege which can be waived.” (quotation omitted)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Einhorn
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Thomas, 552 Pa. 621, 640 , 717 A.2d 468, 478 (1998), cert denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999) (holding failure to instruct on voluntary manslaughter appropriate where no evidence existed to show that appellant killed the victim in a sudden and intense passion); see also Commonwealth v. Browdie, 543 Pa. 337, 349-350 , 671 A.2d 668, 674 (1996) (affirming trial court’s determination that defendant was not entitled to a voluntary manslaughter instruction when no evidence in the case supported such a verdict). ¶ 65 At trial, Einhorn testified that he d…
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Mitchell (2×)
Pa. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Baez, 554 Pa. 66 , 720 A.2d 711, 726 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999); Commonwealth v. Saranchak, 544 Pa. 158 , 675 A.2d 268, 275 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1061 , 117 S.Ct. 695 , 136 L.Ed.2d 617 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Malloy
Pa. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Freeman, 573 Pa. 532 , 827 A.2d 385, 405 (2003) (citing Commonwealth v. Baez, 554 Pa. 66 , 720 A.2d 711, 726 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999)).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Smith
Wash. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rith, 164 F.3d 1323 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 (1999); United States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 1996); Ring v. Erickson, 983 F.2d 818 (8th Cir. 1993); State v. Kennedy, 205 W.
cited Cited "see" Colbert v. Commonwealth
Ky. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Kith, 164 F.3d 1323, 1328-1331 (1999), cert, denied 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Becker
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bith, 164 F.3d 1323, 1334 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Castorena-Jaime
D. Kan. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Chalan, 812 F.2d at 1307 ; see United States v. Rith, 164 F.3d 1323, 1333 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hubert, Douglas Michael
Tex. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Rith , 164 F.3d 1323, 1330 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied 528 U.S. 827 (1999) (noting that "control for most purposes" is a normative inquiry which depends on the relationship between the consenting third party and the appellant; where the relationship is of the kind that creates a presumption of control, as does the parent-child relationship, and the presumption is not rebutted, the third party has authority to consent, even if the third party had not been using the room). 25.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hubert v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Rith, 164 F.3d 1323, 1330 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999) (noting that "control for most purposes” is a normative inquiry which depends on the relationship between the consenting third party and the appellant; where the relationship is of the kind that creates a presumption of control, as does the parent-child relationship, and the presumption is not rebutted, the third party has authority to consent, even if the third party had not been using the room). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hubert, Douglas Michael
Tex. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Rith, 164 F.3d 1323, 1330 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied 528 U.S. 827 (1999) (noting that “control for most purposes” is a normative inquiry which depends on the relationship between the consenting third party and the appellant; where the relationship is of the kind that creates a presumption of control, as does the parent-child relationship, and the presumption is not rebutted, the third party has authority to consent, even if the third party had not been using the room).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bessolo
5th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Dortch, 199 F.3d 193, 197 (5th Cir. 1999), modified on denial of reh’g, 203 F.3d 883 (5th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Castro, 166 F.3d 728, 731 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 309, 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Catrett (2×)
C.A.A.F. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Rith, 164 F.3d 1323, 1332 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 78 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 (1999); United States v. Mitchell, 966 F.2d 92, 98 (2d Cir.1992); United States v. Lanni, 951 F.2d 440, 442-43 (1st Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Arnold
La. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, U.S. v. Castro, 166 F.3d 728 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vail
v.
United States
No. 98-8999.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
528 U.S. 827
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.