green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
15.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2008 ·
…the jury oath is designed to vindicate a defendant's fundamental constitutional rights to a fair trial before an impartial jury
⚠ not in text
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Harris v. State
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
the jury oath is designed to vindicate a defendant's fundamental constitutional rights to a fair trial before an impartial jury
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cagno
See State v. Barone, 329 Or. 210 , 986 P.2d 5, 21 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1086 , 120 S.Ct. 813 , 145 L.Ed. 2d 685 (2000) (witness's sentence and appeal, when he no longer had a Fifth Amendment privilege to refuse to testify, could support *942 inference that the "refusal to testify was motivated by a desire to protect defendant."); United States v. Harman, 66 M.J. 710, 711-15 (A.Ct.Crim.App.2008), review granted 2009 CAAF Lexis 619 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (photo of military police officer with "thumbs up" admissible as evidence of "approval and encouragement to her co-conspirators as they maltr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
N.J.S.A. 2C:13-4(c), (d); see also Wilkins v. State, 985 P. 2d 184, 185-86 (Okla.Crim.App.1999) (holding that child stealing statute was not overbroad because statute did not criminalize every activity with child by one parent but strictly prohibited malicious, forcible, or fraudulent taking of child with intent to detain and conceal from other parent), cert. denied, *314 528 U.S. 1086 , 120 S.Ct. 813 , 145 L.Ed. 2d 685 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilkins
v.
Oklahoma
v.
Oklahoma
No. 99-6768.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (2)
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.