Estrada-Torres v. United States, 531 U.S. 864 (2000). · Go Syfert
Estrada-Torres v. United States, 531 U.S. 864 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where, as here, the district court understood that it had the ability to depart but refused to do so, we lack jurisdiction to review that refusal.”
23 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Craig (ca3, 2002-06-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Craig
3rd Cir. · 2002 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where, as here, the district court understood that it had the ability to depart but refused to do so, we lack jurisdiction to review that refusal.
cited Cited "see" Garcia v. Dep't of Hous. & Cmty. Dev.
Mass. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rodriguez v. New York , 197 F.3d 611 , 618 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 864 , 121 S.Ct. 156 , 148 L.Ed.2d 104 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Hayward George Slater, Jr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sholars v. State, 312 S.W.3d 694, 701 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. ref‘d), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 156 10 (2010) (―Appellant argues that the State introduced a unanimity requirement into its statement of the law and that the trial court erred in failing to sustain his objection to the State‘s misstatement of the law and thus deprived him of his constitutional right to due process by requiring him to mount a successful defense to capital murder before considering the lesser included charge of felony murder or any other lesser included charge.‖).
discussed Cited "see" Torabi v. Gonzales
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tapia-Acuna v. INS, 640 F.2d 223 , 224 n. 3 (9th Cir.1981) (holding, under former statute, that a notice filed by the INS notifying the court that the BIA had issued its decision manifested clear intention of the parties to seek review of the second BIA decision and, thus, construing the notice as a second petition for review), superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized in United States v. Estrada-Torres, 179 F.3d 776, 778 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 864 , 121 S.Ct. 156 , 148 L.Ed.2d 104 (2000). 2.
cited Cited "see" Manz v. Gaffney
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rodriguez v. City of New York, 197 F.3d 611, 618 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 864 , 121 S.Ct. 156 , 148 L.Ed.2d 104 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Aurelio Garcia-Martinez
9th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Estrada-Torres, 179 F.3d 776, 780 (9th Cir.1999) cert. denied — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 156 , — L.Ed.2d — (2000). 6 . 8 C.F.R. § 238.1 (b)(2)(i) provides in relevant part: The Notice of Intent shall set forth the preliminary determinations and inform the alien of the Service's intent to issue a ...
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estrada-Torres
v.
United States
No. 99-10166.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
531 U.S. 864

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.