discussed Cited "see" United States v. Melayne R. Danekas See United States v. Berry, 212 F.3d 391, 394-95 (8th Cir.) (“common scheme or plan” under U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(l)(A) (relevant conduct) is defined more broadly than “single common scheme or plan” under § 4A1.2(a)(2) (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000); Maza, 93 F.3d at 1399-1400 (prior convictions for selling cocaine were unrelated, in part because sales took place in different states); United States v. Garcia, 962 F.2d 479, 482 (5th Cir.) (two distinct, separate drug deliveries were not part of common scheme even though crimes were …

cited Cited "see" Reyna v. State See Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128-30 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Thomas v. State See also, Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000); Smallwood v. State, 748 P.2d 1141, 1143 (Wyo.1988).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Godin Compare United States v. Berry, 212 F.3d 391, 393-95 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000), United States v. Brown, 209 F.3d 1020 , 1024 n. 9 (7th Cir.2000), and United States v. Beckett, 208 F.3d 140 , 147 n. 2 (3d Cir.2000), with United States v. LaBarbara, 129 F.3d 81, 86 (2d Cir.1997), and United States v. Mullens, 65 F.3d 1560, 1565 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1112 , 116 S.Ct. 1337 , 134 L.Ed.2d 487 (1996).