green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Roebuck v. State
(2×)
Moreover, the “extent to which a declarant expects his statement to subject him to criminal liability also reflects on the statement’s reliability.” Camacho, 163 F.Supp.2d at 307 ; see United States v. Moskowitz, 215 F.3d 265, 269 (2d Cir.) (concluding that plea allocution was reliable because declarant was subjected to incarceration), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1014 , 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000).
examined
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Robins
(4×)
See generally United States v. Moskowitz, 215 F.3d 265, 269 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1014 , 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000) (emphasizing the reliability of a plea allocution, as it directly subjected the declarant to a lengthy prison term).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laplace v. Demarco, No. Cv 01-0095009 S (Oct. 16, 2002)
(2×)
See Thomas v. Dickel , 213 F.3d 1023 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1013 , 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chan
(2×)
In accord with the Supreme Court’s holding in Williamson v. United States, however, only those portions of the plea allocution which are self-inculpatory are admissible under Rule 804(b)(3), 512 U.S. 594, 600 , 114 S.Ct. 2431 , 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994); see United States v. Moskowitz, 215 F.3d 265, 269 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1014 , 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000); see also Winley, 638 F.2d at 562 & n. 2 (noting that the guilty plea allocutions of each co-defendant which were redacted to omit any reference to the defendant on trial fully qualified as declarations against penal…
discussed
Cited "see"
Slaughter v. Parker
(2×)
See Sanders v. Freeman, 221 F.3d 846 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1014 , 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000); Workman v. Bell, 178 F.3d 759 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 913 , 120 S.Ct. 264 , 145 L.Ed.2d 221 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Tropeano, and Marlon Tropeano, David Barroso, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Moskowitz, 215 F.3d 265, 268 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Shell Oil Co.
(2×)
See Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co., 210 F.3d 18, 25-26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000); Davidson v. Enstar Corp., 848 F.2d 574, 577-78 (5th Cir.1988).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa
(3×)
See United States v. Moskowitz, 215 F.3d 265, 268 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 571 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tsoulas v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston
(2×)
Bank v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Hous. & Urban Dev., 768 F.2d 5, 11-12 (1st Cir.1985); see also Bhd. of Locomotive Eng’rs v. Springfield Terminal Ry., 210 F.3d 18, 31 (1st Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1014 , 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ayer v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston
(2×)
See Docket # 11, 15, 19. “[T]o stipulate a record for decision allows the judge to decide any significant issues of material fact that he discovers.” Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Hous. & Urban Dev., 768 F.2d 5, 11-12 (1st Cir.1985); see also Bhd. of Locomotive Eng’rs v. Springfield Terminal Ry., 210 F.3d 18, 31 (1st Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1014 , 121 S.Ct. 571 , 148 L.Ed.2d 489 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perkin-Elmer Corp.
v.
TA Instruments, Inc.
v.
TA Instruments, Inc.
No. 00-541.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 2000.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.