green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Dilworth v. Captain Adams
Ctrs., 422 F.3d 1090 , 1106 n.12 (10th Cir. 2005); Benjamin v, Fraser, 264 F.3d 175, 188-89 (2d Cir. 2001); Rapier v. Harris, 172 F.3d 999, 1004-05 (7th Cir. 1999); Mitchell v. Dupnik, 75 F.3d 517, 524 (9th Cir. 1996); see also Fuentes v. Wagner, 206 F.3d 335 , 342 n.9 (3rd Cir. 2000) (holding Sandin inapplicable to detainee convicted but not yet sentenced), cert denied, 531 U.S. 821 , 121 S.Ct. 63 , 148 L.Ed.2d 29 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United States
The Court held that to demonstrate that an invention is ready for patenting a party could prove, inter alia, either that the invention was reduced to practice before the critical date or, “that prior to the critical date the inventor had prepared drawings or other descriptions of the invention that were sufficiently specific to enable a person skilled in the art to practice the invention.” Id. at 67-68 , 119 S.Ct. 304 ; see also Vanmoor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 201 F.3d 1363, 1366 (Fed.Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 821 , 121 S.Ct. 63 , 148 L.Ed.2d 29 (2000). 22 The Supreme Court furth…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Felipe XACUR, Jose Maria Xacur, and Jacobo Xacur
v.
BANCO NACIONAL DE MEXICO, S.A.
v.
BANCO NACIONAL DE MEXICO, S.A.
No. 99-1969.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.