green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Crosby v. Watkins
See Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257, 1267 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 833 , 121 S.Ct. 88 , 148 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Mueller
See Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257, 1268 (10th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 833 , 121 S.Ct. 88 , 148 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (because petitioner failed to carry his burden under Hooks v. Ward, “we may presume that the state procedural rules at issue in this case are adequate grounds for barring habeas review of his federal claims”); see also Nickerson v. Roe, 260 F.Supp.2d 875, 892 (N.D.Cal.2003) (“Nickerson has not challenged the adequacy of the asserted timeliness bar and therefore has not met his burden under Bennett .
discussed
Cited "see"
Willingham v. Gibson
(2×)
See Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257 , 1264 n. 1 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, [ 531 U.S. 833 , 121 S.Ct. 88 , 148 L.Ed.2d 49 ] (2000). 22 Walker v. Gibson, 228 F.3d 1217, 1225 (10th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 933 , 121 S.Ct. 2560 , 150 L.Ed.2d 725 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Sallahdin v. Gibson
See Walker, 228 F.3d at 1225 (citing Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257 , 1264 n. 1 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 833 , 121 S.Ct. 88 , 148 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000)).
cited
Cited "see"
Barnett v. LeMaster
See Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257 , 1264 n. 1 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 833 , 121 S.Ct. 88 , 148 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Bowling v. Parker
See Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257, 1269 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 88 , 148 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Al-Mosawi v. Gibson
See generally Smallwood 14 v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257, 1267 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 88 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. Gibson
See Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257 , 1264 n. 1 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 88 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Love v. Scribner
Where the “prosecutor has offered a race-neutral explanation for the peremptory challenges and the trial court has ruled on the ultimate question of intentional discrimination, the preliminary issue of whether the defendant had made a prima facie showing becomes moot.” Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 359 , 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991) (plurality opinion) (direct appeal); see also, Stubbs v. Gomez, 189 F.3d 1099, 1104 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 832 , 121 S.Ct. 88 , 148 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (applying Hernandez rule to § 2254 habeas case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romano v. Gibson
See Smith, 235 F.3d at 1275 (noting, in dicta, habeas petitioner had failed to develop, in state court, evidence supporting her claim that State did not disclose complete transcript of its interview with key government witness, where petitioner received state evi-dentiary hearing, but failed to present any evidence there supporting her transcript claim); see also Smallwood v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 1257, 1266 (10th Cir.1999) (holding petitioner failed diligently to seek to develop factual basis of habeas claim where, although Oklahoma appellate court invited petitioner to assert ineffective assistan…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Johnson
v.
Mitchem, Warden
v.
Mitchem, Warden
No. 99-9435.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.