green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. Warden of Clinton Correctional Facility
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97-98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bradshaw
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir.) (holding that because less onerous sanctions were available to minimize prejudice to prosecution, finding of willfulness required to justify exclusion), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001); United States v. Peters, 937 F.2d 1422, 1426 (9th Cir.1991) (declaring that because of accused’s fundamental right to present witnesses in his or her own defense, witness exclusions only upheld in cases involving willful and blatant discovery violations).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Senkowski
Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-71 , 108 S.Ct. 2379 , 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); accord, e.g., Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.) (“We conclude that the district court properly extended the prison mailbox rule to petitions for writs of habeas corpus.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCalla v. Greiner
Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-71 , 108 S.Ct. 2379 , 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); accord, e.g., Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.) (“We conclude that the district court properly extended the prison mailbox rule to petitions for writs of habeas corpus.”) ( & citing cases for other federal applications of the rule), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Purdy v. Bennett
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97-98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Bennett
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97-98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. McCaughtry
See also Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001) (stating that mailbox rule had been extended to service and filing of various papers). 12 .Because timeliness is an affirmative defense, I do not ordinarily address it on initial screening.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carracedo v. Artuz
"Post AEDPA Second Circuit cases have declined to rule on this issue, finding instead that the result is the same under either standard.” Ryan, 303 F.3d at 254 (collecting cases); see also Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93 , 101 n. 5 (2d Cir.2001) ("Because we conclude that the error was not harmless under both possible standards of review, we decline to express a view as to which standard should apply.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001); Lyons v. Johnson, 99 F.3d 499, 503 (2d Cir.1996) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bohan v. Kuhlmann
(2×)
See id. at 410, 108 S.Ct. 646 ; see also Noble v. Kelly, 89 F.Supp.2d 443, 454 (2000), aff'd, 246 F.3d 93 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Victor Sanchez v. George Duncan
See, e.g., Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93 , 101-02 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Setala v. J.C. Penney Co.
See, e.g., Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001); Burns v. Morton, 134 F.3d 109, 110 (3d Cir.1998). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kelly, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility
v.
Noble
v.
Noble
No. 01-28.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.