green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.
But see United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir.2001), ce rt. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002).
cited
Cited "but see"
NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.
But see United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Of Louisiana v. Jason Leon Griffin
See State v. Duncan, 99- 2615 ( La. 10/ 16/ 01), 802 So. 2d 533 , 549- 50, cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S. Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 ( 2002). 31 A thorough review of the record reveals the trial court, State, and defendant were all actively engaged in a full and complete voir dire.
cited
Cited "see"
State Of Louisiana v. Donovan Darville
See State v. Duncan, 99- 2615 ( La. 10/ 16/ 01), 802 So. 2d 533, 545 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S. Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed. 2d 183 ( 2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Henderson
See State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 24 (La.10/16/01), 802 So.2d 533, 550 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Prejean
See State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 14 (La. 10/16/01), 802 So.2d 533, 545 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Knight
Accord United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002). 1 The threatened conduct that is a prerequisite to the prohibition is serious: “harassing, stalking, threatening,” or other conduct that would cause “reasonable fear of bodily injury”; and the court order must make a specific finding of “a credible threat to the physical safety” of an intimate partner or child or an explicit prohibition on the use of force “that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury.” 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(8).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. State
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1255-56 (11th Cir.2001) (deciding the retroactivity issue first because "if Apprendi does not apply retroactively, this alone resolves the case"), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawton, Andre
See generally United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203, 260-61 (5th Cir. 2001) (holding that although the Second Amendment does include an individual’s right to bear arms, that right is nonetheless subject to reasonable restriction), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S. Ct. 2362 (2002); see also United States v. Price, 328 F.3d 958, 961 (7th Cir. 2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre Lawton
See generally United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203, 260-61 (5th Cir.2001) (holding that although the Second Amendment does include an individual’s right to bear arms, that right is nonetheless subject to reasonable restriction), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002); see also United States v. Price, 328 F.3d 958, 961 (7th Cir.2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Banks
See 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Banks
See 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackubowski
See United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203, 261 (5th Cir.2002) (upholding against constitutional attack § 922(g)(8), which precludes individuals under certain restraining orders from possessing firearms, and specifically noting that § 922(g)(1) is constitutional), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203, 261 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 2362 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Randee Lee Bayles, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
See United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Lombardo v. United States
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Turpin v. Thoms
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Snyder
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert denied. — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matthew Henry
See, e.g., United States v. Haney, 264 F.3d 1161, 1170-71 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Franklyn, 157 F.3d 90, 93, 96-97 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1112 , 119 S.Ct. 887 , 142 L.Ed.2d 786 (1999); United States v. Wright, 117 F.3d 1265 , 1267, 1270-71 (11th Cir.1997), vacated in part on rehearing on other grounds by United States v. Wright, 133 F.3d 1412 (11th Cir. 1998); United States v. Knutson, 113 F.3d 27, 31 (5th Cir.1997) (per curiam); United States v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273, 284-85 (3d Cir.1996), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larson
In Mahin , the Fourth Circuit stated that, “when Congress enacted § 922(g)(8) it was ‘legislating against the background of the rule of American law that for an injunction to issue there must be a likelihood that irreparable harm will occur.’ ” Id. at 126 (quoting United States v. Elkins, 780 F.Supp.2d 473, 479 (W.D.Va. 2011)); see also Chapman, 666 F.3d at 228 (“ ‘Congress in enacting section 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) proceeded on the assumption that the laws of the several states were such that court orders, issued after notice and hearing, should not embrace the prohibitions of paragrap…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Op. Off. of Legal Counsel, "Whether the Second Amendment Secures an Individual Right" (2004) available at http://www. usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.pdf; see also Memorandum from John Ashcroft, Attorney General, to All United States' Attorneys (Nov. 9, 2001), reprinted in Br. for the United States in Opposition at 26, Emerson, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Parker
(2×)
Compare United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203, 260 (5th Cir.2001) (individual right), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002), with Silveira v. Lockyer, 312 F.3d 1052, 1086 (9th Cir.2002) (collective right), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 803 , 157 L.Ed.2d 693 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph H. Fleischli
See also United States v. Haney, 264 F.3d 1161, 1166-71 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002) (upholding section 922(o) against a post- Morrison Commerce Clause challenge).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ovalle v. United States
Appx. 152 (6th Cir.2002) (unpublished opinion); see also, e.g., McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fleischli, Joseph
See also United States v. Haney, 264 F.3d 1161, 1166-71 (10th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 2362 (2002) (upholding section 922(o) against a post- Morrison Commerce Clause challenge).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moreno v. Snyder
See Goode v. United States, 39 Fed.Appx. 152, at 155-158 (6th Cir.2002); see also, e.g., McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 , 2002 WL 1271048 (U.S. June 10, 2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert, denied, -U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philistin
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
01-8451.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 2002.
Published
PHILISTIN
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 01-8451.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 10, 2002.
1
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 565 Pa. 455, 774 A. 2d 741.