green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Flag Telecom Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation
See In re Vivendi 242 F.R.D. at 107 (“The determination of whether a particular action is manageable is ‘peculiarly’ within the discretion of the district court.”) (citing In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litig., 280 F.3d 124, 141 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 917 , 122 S.Ct. 2382 , 153 L.Ed.2d 201 (2002)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newman v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc.
See generally, e.g., In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litig., 280 F.3d 124, 132-33 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 917 , 122 S.Ct. 2382 , 153 L.Ed.2d 201 (2002); Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 267 F.3d 147 , 155-56 & n. 1 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 951 , 122 S.Ct. 1349 , 152 L.Ed.2d 251 (2002); Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 291 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107, 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000); Marisol A. v. Giuliani, 126 F.3d 372 , 375-76 & n. 3 (2d Cir.1997); In re NTL, Inc. Sec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vengurlekar v. Silverline Technologies, Ltd.
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. “ Tn determining the propriety of a class action, the question is not whether the plaintiff or plaintiffs have stated a cause of action or will prevail on the merits, but rather whether the requirements of Rule 23 are met.’ ” In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litig., 280 F.3d 124, 133 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 917 , 122 S.Ct. 2382 , 153 L.Ed.2d 201 (2002) (quoting Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 178 , 94 S.Ct. 2140 , 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974)).
examined
Cited "see"
Bolanos v. Norwegian Cruise Lines Ltd.
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
HH 83-96.) ANALYSIS Rule 23(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., sets forth the requirements for class certification: “(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims ... of the representative parties are typical of the claims ... of the class, and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a); see generally, e.g., In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litig., 280 F.3d 124, 132-33 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2382 , 15…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
See, e.g., In re Visa Check/Mastermoney Antitrust Lit., 192 F.R.D. 68, 88-89 (E.D.N.Y.2000) (certifying a class action under Rule 23(b)(3) and Rule 23(b)(2) because the plaintiffs sought “highly significant injunctive relief’), aff'd, 280 F.3d 124 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 917 , 122 S.Ct. 2382 , 153 L.Ed.2d 201 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Majors v. State
Smith v. State, 547 N.E.2d 817, 820 (Ind.1989); see also Ben-Yisrayl v. State, 753 N.E.2d 649, 653 (Ind.2001), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2382 , 153 L.Ed.2d 201 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marbly
v.
Department of the Treasury Et Al.
v.
Department of the Treasury Et Al.
01-9231.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 2002.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.