green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “ ‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’” Sanin, 252 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “ ‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’ ” Sanin, 252…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilcher
See United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001); and cases cited at page 3-4 of the Government’s motion to dismiss the petition.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosario-Dominguez v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’ ” Sanin, 252 …
cited
Cited "see"
Stafford v. Hemingway
See United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 461 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 404 (2001); Charles v. Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir.1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. Sanders
See United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 461 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 404 (2001); Charles, 180 F.3d at 755 .
cited
Cited "see"
Asprilla v. Davis
See United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 461 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 404 (2001); Charles v. Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir.1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Muhammad v. Young
See United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 461 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 404 (2001); Charles, 180 F.3d at 755-56 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bryan
See United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 84-85 (2d Cir.) (finding no Bruton or Gray error where prosecutors used the phrases “several individuals” and “individuals” in lieu of codefendants’ names), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 151 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carney
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 01-6408.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 2001.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.