discussed Cited "see" United States v. Anthony R. West See United States v. Stuckey, 255 F.3d 528, 530-31 (8th Cir.) (“law of the case” doctrine governs issues decided in prior appeal), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1011 , 122 S.Ct. 498 , 151 L.Ed.2d 409 (2001); United States v. Kress, 58 F.3d 370, 373 (8th Cir.1995) (where party could have raised issue in prior appeal but did not, court later hearing same case need not consider matter).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dunn (2×) See United States v. Stuckey, 255 F.3d 528, 530 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1011 , 122 S.Ct. 498 , 151 L.Ed.2d 409 (2001); United States v. Santiago, 238 F.3d 213, 216-17 (2d Cir.2001); United States v. Dorris, 236 F.3d 582, 585-86 (10th Cir.2000); United States v. Napier, 233 F.3d 394, 399-402 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Wesela, 223 F.3d 656, 659-60 (7th Cir.2000). 52 In short, we find none of appellant's claims persuasive, and, accordingly, we affirm. 53 AFFIRMED.

cited Cited "see" United States v. Lenora Logan, United States of America v. Keith Maynie See United States v. Stuckey, 265 F.8d 528, 531 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1011 , 122 S.Ct. 498 , 151 L.Ed.2d 409 (2001).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tanner Compare People v. Wagener, 196 Ill.2d 269 , 256 Ill.Dec. 550 , 752 N.E.2d 430 , cert. den, 534 U.S. 1011 , 122 S.Ct. 498 , 151 L.Ed.2d 408 (2001); Smylie v. State, 823 N.E.2d 679 (Ind.2005), cert. den, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 545 , 163 L.Ed.2d 459 (2005); People v. Black, 35 Cal.4th 1238 , 29 Cal. Rptr.3d 740 , 113 P.3d 534 , cert. pending (2005); and State v. Cubias, 155 Wash.2d 549 , 120 P.3d 929 (2005), with In re VanDelft, 158 Wash.2d 731 , 147 P.3d 573 (2006), State v. Foster, 109 Oh.