green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.2 score
“the purpose of excluding identifications that result from suggestive police procedures is not 287 deterrence but rather the reduction of the likelihood of misidentification.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State of New Jersey v. Stephon G. Wright
reliability, in the identification context, means essentially that the witness's recollection was 'undistorted.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Richardson v. Superintendent of Mid-Orange Correctional Facility
the purpose of excluding identifications that result from suggestive police procedures is not 287 deterrence but rather the reduction of the likelihood of misidentification.
cited
Cited "see"
Troy Brown v. John Keane, Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York
See Raheem v. Kelly, 257 F.3d 122, 142 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1118 , 122 S.Ct. 930 , 151 L.Ed.2d 892 (2002); Wray v. Johnson, 202 F.3d 515, 526 (2d Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lonnie Glover v. Standard Fed. Bank
See HUD Policy Statement I, at 10084. -14- The Eleventh Circuit has arguably endorsed at least part of this line of reasoning in its recent decision in Culpepper v. Irwin Mortgage Corp., 253 F.3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 930 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, Warden
(2×)
See Thigpen, 804 F.2d at 897 (noting that accuracy refers not only to whether a prior description matches a suspect but also “how particularly a description matches a suspect”) (emphasis in original); see also Raheem v. Kelly, 257 F.3d 122, 138 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1118 , 122 S.Ct. 930 , 151 L.Ed.2d 892 (2002) (“Nor do the descriptions of the shooter given by [the witnesses] instill any confidence as to the reliability of their identifications ... for though they provided general information as to the shooter’s age, height, and weight, they provided virtually no detail…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Coca-Cola Bottling Company Consolidated
v.
Coca-Cola Bottling Company Consolidated
No. 01-699.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 2002.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1) · E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.