Burnett v. United States, 537 U.S. 839 (2002). · Go Syfert
Burnett v. United States, 537 U.S. 839 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kistler v. State (indctapp, 2010-11-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kistler v. State
Ind. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Timberlake v. State, 753 N.E.2d 591, 610 (Ind.2001) (holding that petitioner's ineffective assistance claim failed where there was not a reasonable probability that the jury would have found the proposed mitigators to outweigh the very weighty aggravator), reh'g denied, cert. denied, 537 U.S. 839 , 123 S.Ct. 162 , 154 L.Ed.2d 61 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Ronald Rompilla v. Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Martin Horn, Appellant/cross-Appellee (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See McWee v. Weldon, 283 F.3d 179, 188 (4th Cir.2002) (“the reasonableness of an investigation ... must be considered in light of the scarcity of counsel’s time and resources in preparing for a sentencing hearing”), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 893 , 123 S.Ct. 162 , 154 L.Ed.2d 158 (2002); Mahaffey v. Page, 151 F.3d 671, 685 (7th Cir.) (“A ‘reasonable investigation’ does not mandate a ‘scorch-the-earth strategy,’ a requirement that would fail to consider the limited time and resources that defense lawyers have in preparing for a sentencing hearing.”) (citations omitted), vacated i…
discussed Cited "see" Fisher v. State
Ind. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Timberlake v. State, 753 N.E.2d 591, 605 (Ind.2001) (concluding there was no deficient performance where law was unclear at the time of direct appeal whether particular claim would have been waived if not raised on direct appeal), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 162 , 154 L.Ed.2d 61 (2002); cf. Trueblood v. State, 715 N.E.2d 1242, 1258 (Ind.1999) ("[Alppellate counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to anticipate or effectuate a change in the existing law."). 3 B.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Caruthers v. State (2×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Timberlake v. State, 753 N.E.2d 591 , 612 n. 2 (Ind.2001) ("[to the extent it is an argument concerning counsel's own ineffectiveness, it cannot be raised"), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 839 , 123 S.Ct. 162 , 154 L.Ed.2d 61 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burnett
v.
United States
01-10266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 839
Published

537 U.S. 839

BURNETT
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 01-10266.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 272 F. 3d 220.