Kipp v. California, 537 U.S. 846 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Kipp v. California, 537 U.S. 846 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Jacobs (lactapp, 2011-05-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jacobs
La. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Irish, 00-2086, pp. 5-6 (La.1/15/02), 807 So.2d 208, 212 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 846 , 123 S.Ct. 185 , 154 L.Ed.2d 73 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. Gainsheimer
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ford v. Curtis, 277 F.3d 806, 809 (6th Cir.) (explaining that a state prisoner is not entitled to habeas relief unless he can establish actual prejudice), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 846 , 123 S.Ct. 185 , 154 L.Ed.2d 73 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rolando M. Sierra, Sr. v. D. Romaine, Warden Immigration & Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of America
3rd Cir. · 2003 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Borrero v. Aljets, 325 F.3d 1003, 1007 (8th Cir.2003) (concluding “that Zadvydas’s six-month presumption of reasonableness is inapplicable to inadmissible aliens”), Benitez v. Wallis, 337 F.3d at 1301 (concluding that “[T]he government has the authority under § 1231(a)(6) to detain inadmissible aliens indefinitely and Zadvydas’s six-month presumption of reasonableness is inapplicable to inadmissible aliens.”), Rios v. INS, 324 F.3d 296, 297 (5th Cir.2003) (concluding that Zadvydas “distinguished the status of deportable aliens from that of excludable aliens”), and Hoyt…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sierra v. Romaine
3rd Cir. · 2003 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Borrero v. Aljets, 325 F.3d 1003, 1007 (8th Cir. 2003) (concluding “that Zadvydas’s six-month presumption of reasonableness is inapplicable to inadmissible aliens”), Benitez v. Wallis, 337 F.3d at 1301 (concluding that “[T]he government has the authority under § 1231(a)(6) to detain inadmissible aliens indefinitely and Zadvydas’s six-month presumption of reasonableness is inapplicable to inadmissible aliens.”), Rios v. INS, 324 F.3d 296, 297 (5th Cir. 2003) (concluding that Zadvydas “distinguished the status of deportable aliens from that of excludable aliens”), and Ho…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kipp
v.
California
01-10497.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 846
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

537 U.S. 846

KIPP
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 01-10497.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

2

Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Cal.4th 1100, 33 P.3d 450.