Kafele v. Karnes, 539 U.S. 904 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Kafele v. Karnes, 539 U.S. 904 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (62 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: KND Holdings LLC v. Manis (cod, 2025-01-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" KND Holdings LLC v. Manis
D. Colo. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See MacArthur v. San Juan County, 309 F.3d 1216, 1221 (10th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 123 S.Ct. 2246 (2003); Denison v. Colorado Department of Corrections, 2008 WL 732592 at *6 (D.
discussed Cited "see" Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China National Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp.
D.N.J. · 2010 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara, 313 F.3d 70, 92 (2d Cir.2002) (citing In re Oil Spill by The Amoco Cadiz, 954 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir.1992) (per curiam) and Access Telecom, 197 F.3d at 714 ), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 904 , 123 S.Ct. 2256 , 156 L.Ed.2d 113 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Figueroa
2d Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Quintieri, 306 F.3d 1217, 1233-34 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 110 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bunn
2d Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Quintieri, 306 F.3d 1217, 1225, 1228-29 (2d Cir.2002) (articulating the basis and scope of the so-called “mandate rule”), cert, denied, 539 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 110 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara
2d Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara, 313 F.3d 70, 75, 92-93 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 904 , 123 S.Ct. 2256 , 156 L.Ed.2d 113 (2003).
cited Cited "see" MacArthur v. San Juan County
D. Utah · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See 539 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 110 (2003). 139 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Driessen v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Grp. v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1325); see also Flexfab, LLC, v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254, 1265 (Fed.Cir. 2005) (citing Schism v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259, 1278 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 910 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 125 (2003)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Grp. v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1325 ); see also Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254, 1265 (Fed.Cir.2005) (citing Schism v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259, 1278 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en bane), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 910 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 125 (2003)); Mastrolia v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 369, 384 (2010) (citing Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d at 1265 ); Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343, 1353 (Fed.Cir.2003) (citing Cal. Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vasko v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Grp. v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1325); see also Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254, 1265 (Fed.Cir. 2005) (citing Schism v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259, 1278 (Fed.Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 910 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 125 (2003)); Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343, 1353 (Fed.Cir.2003) (citing Cal. Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keehn v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Grp. v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1325); see also Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254, 1265 (Fed.Cir.2005) (citing Schism v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259, 1278 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 910 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 125 (2003)); Mastrolia v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 369, 384 (2010) (citing Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d at 1265 ); Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343 , 1353 (Fed.Cir.2003) (citing Cal. Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Defendant responds, “[b]ecause the CICA requires agencies to evaluate competitive proposals based solely upon the factors specified in the solicitation, NASA could not have ‘ratified,’ the purchase order to apply to anything but what was set forth in the solicitation.” Defendant also argues that NASA “could ratify the scope of work to include all contracts only if the original agreement was invalid or unauthorized.” The concept of ratification requires that a superior official “have authority to ratify, knowledge of a subordinate’s unauthorized act, and then must confirm, adopt…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Goldings v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Grp. v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1325); see also Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254, 1265 (Fed.Cir.2005) (citing Schism v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259, 1278 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 910 , 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 125 (2003)); Mastrolia v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 369, 384 (2010) (citing Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d at 1265 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." EED HOLDINGS v. Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sheridan v. Trustees of Columbia Univ., 296 A.D.2d 314, 316 , 745 N.Y.S.2d 18, 19 (1st Dep’t 2002) (negligent misrepresentation claim dismissed "since, at the time of the alleged misrepresentation, the parties were clearly acting at arm's length”), leave to appeal denied, 99 N.Y.2d 505 , 755 N.Y.S.2d 711 , 785 N.E.2d 733 , cert. denied, 539 U.S. 904 , 123 S.Ct. 2253 , 156 L.Ed.2d 112 (2003); WIT Holding Corp. v. Klein, 282 A.D.2d 527, 529 , 724 N.Y.S.2d 66, 68 (2d Dep’t 2001) (modifying court order to dismiss negligent misrepresentation claim on grounds that arm’s length bus…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dureiko v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
An implied-in-fact contract is an agreement “‘founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, their tacit understanding.’ ” Trauma Serv., Group v. United States, 104 F.3d 1321, 1326 (1997) (quoting Hercules, Inc. v. United States, 516 U.S. 417, 424 , 116 S.Ct. 981 , 134 L.Ed.2d 47 (1996)) (quoting Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592, 597 , 58 Ct.Cl. 709 , 43 S.Ct. 425 , 67 L.Ed. 816 (1923)); see also Schism v. United States, …
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sweazey v. United States Ex Rel. Veterans Administration Medical Center
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Schism v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259, 1268 (Fed.Cir.2002), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 2246 , 156 L.Ed.2d 125 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kafele
v.
Karnes
02-9054.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 2003.
539 U.S. 904
Published

539 U.S. 904

Kafele
v.
Karnes et al.

No. 02-9054.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 2, 2003.

1

Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Ohio.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 97 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 779 N. E. 2d 1049.