Just v. Mullen, 537 U.S. 820 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Just v. Mullen, 537 U.S. 820 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we agree with the state that the good-faith exception would support the denial of suppression in this instance. thus, we need not address the existence of probable cause to issue the warrant.”
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Anzualda v. Commonwealth (vactapp, 2005-01-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Anzualda v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 2005 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we agree with the state that the good-faith exception would support the denial of suppression in this instance. thus, we need not address the existence of probable cause to issue the warrant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Just
v.
Mullen
01-1771.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 820
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Virginia (1)

537 U.S. 820

JUST
v.
MULLEN.

No. 01-1771.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.

2

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 288 App. Div. 2d 476, 733 N. Y. S. 2d 678.