discussed Cited "see" Gutierrez v. Dretke See Harris v. Cockrell, 313 F.3d 238, 246 (5th Cir.2002) (the introduction of evidence of extraneous offenses, even those of which the defendant has been acquitted, does not violate due process and there is no constitutional requirement extraneous offenses offered at the punishment phase of a capital trial be proven beyond a reasonable doubt), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1218 , 124 S.Ct. 1503 , 158 L.Ed.2d 152 (2004); Vega v. Johnson, 149 F.3d 354, 359 (5th Cir.1998) (extraneous offenses offered at the punishment phase of a capital trial need not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and may be admit…

discussed Cited "see" Prieto v. Dretke See Harris v. Cockrell, 313 F.3d 238, 244 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1218 , 124 S.Ct. 1503 , 158 L.Ed.2d 152 (2004), (holding failure to present double-edged evidence regarding petitioner’s propensity for future violence did not prejudice petitioner because of overwhelming evidence of violence in petitioner’s background); Johnson v. Cockrell, 306 F.3d at 251 (holding petitioner was not prejudiced by the failure of his trial counsel to present evidence of petitioner’s history of childhood abuse where such testimony would have impugned the credibility of petitioner’s relative…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doss v. Crosby See also Nonnette v. Small, 316 F.3d 872, 876-878 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1218 , 124 S.Ct. 1503 , 158 L.Ed.2d 152 (2004) (because no case or controversy remained for released inmate and habeas petition would be moot under Spencer, Heck did not bar § 1983 suit) (citations and footnote omitted).