green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Noel v. Hall
See Simo v. Union of Needletrades, 322 F.3d 602 , 609 (9th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 873 , 124 S.Ct. 224 , 157 L.Ed.2d 134 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Borrego v. BMG U.S. Latin
See Simo v. Union of Needle-trades, 322 F.3d 602 , 610 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 224 , 157 L.Ed.2d 134 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local Union No. 38 v. Pelella
See, e.g., Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District Council, 322 F.3d 602, 612 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 224 , - L.Ed.2d - (2003); Adamszewski, 496 F.2d at 784-85 . 7 Despite his earlier statements denying that the LMRDA served as a basis for his counterclaim, Pelella later submitted jury instructions premised on a surprising theory of relief: violations of his due process rights under the LMRDA.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local Union No. 38, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Afl-Cio v. Pelella
See, e.g., Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District Council, 322 F.3d 602, 612 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 224 , ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2003); Adamszewski, 496 F.2d at 784-85 . 7 55 Despite his earlier statements denying that the LMRDA served as a basis for his counterclaim, Pelella later submitted jury instructions premised on a surprising theory of relief: violations of his due process rights under the LMRDA.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodwell
v.
Pepe
v.
Pepe
03-26.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
Published
RODWELL
v.
PEPE.
No. 03-26.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 1st Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 324 F. 3d 66.