green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Levanduski
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Santiago, 822 A.2d 716, 729 (Pa.Super.2003), appeal denied, 577 Pa. 679 , 843 A.2d 1237 (2004), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 942 , 124 S.Ct. 2916 , 159 L.Ed.2d 820 (2004) (stating "forfeiture by wrongdoing" exception to hearsay rule applies when accused's criminal wrongdoing was committed with intent to make witness unavailable to testify; the exception does not apply when defendant murdered victim not to prevent him from testifying but because of personal animosity) (citing Commonwealth v. Laich, 566 Pa. 19 , 28 n. 4, 777 A.2d 1057 , 1062 n. 4 (2001)). ¶ 30 Regarding the "state…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lavigne
v.
Varner, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield
v.
Varner, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield
03-10023.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
Published
LAVIGNE
v.
VARNER, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT SMITHFIELD, ET AL.
No. 03-10023.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 28, 2004.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.