Akinola v. United States, 540 U.S. 1063 (2003). · Go Syfert
Akinola v. United States, 540 U.S. 1063 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Rorrer (ca6, 2005-12-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Rorrer
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Solorio, 337 F.3d 580, 603 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1063 , 124 S.Ct. 850 , 157 L.Ed.2d 723 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. McMahan
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sobrio, 337 F.3d 580, 596-97 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1063 , 124 S.Ct. 850 , 157 L.Ed.2d 723 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sexton
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Solorio, 337 F.3d 580, 596-97 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1063 , 124 S.Ct. 850 , 157 L.Ed.2d 723 (2003); United States *751 v. Lawrence, 308 F.3d 623, 634 (6th Cir.2002) (“Apprendi by its terms applies only where the finding ‘increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum,’ and we have squarely held that Apprendi does not apply to the Guidelines.”); United States v. Garcia, 252 F.3d 838, 843 (6th Cir.2001) (“Apprendi does not purport to apply to penalties in excess of any particular range or based on any particular offense level …
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ansari
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Solorio, 337 F.3d 580, 600 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 850 , 157 L.Ed.2d 723 and — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 857 , 157 L.Ed.2d 730 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mamoudou Bathily
6th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have not yet decided what standard of review applies to a § 3B1.1 determination that a district court did make, but " 'it is clear that factual findings made by the district court are reviewed for clear error.’ ” United States v. Young, 553 F.3d 1035, 1053 (6th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Walls, 546 F.3d 728, 735 (6th Cir.2008)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 204 , 175 L.Ed.2d 125 (2009); cf. United States v. Baker, 559 F.3d 443, 449 (6th Cir.2009) (seeming to review § 3Bl.l(a) enhancement for clear error); see also United States v. Solorio, 337 F.3d 580, 600-01 (6th Cir.) (an…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gomez-Rosario
1st Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ruiz Solorio, 337 F.3d 580, 589-91 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1063 , 124 S.Ct. 850 , 157 L.Ed.2d 723 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Akinola
v.
United States
03-7076.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 2003.
540 U.S. 1063
Published

540 U.S. 1063

AKINOLA
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 03-7076.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 1, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 3d Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 66 Fed. Appx. 314.