discussed Cited "see" Joshua Cobbs v. State See Keller v. State, 125 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. dism‟d), (evidence sufficient where Appellant read and signed a similar “Waiver of Constitutional Rights, Agreement to Stipulate, and Judicial Confession stating „I understand the above allegations and I 5 confess they are true”‟), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 906 , 125 S.Ct. 1603 , 161 L.Ed.2d 280 (2005).

discussed Cited "see" Joshua Cobbs v. State See Keller v. State, 125 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tex.App. -- Houston [1[st] Dist.] 2003, pet. dism'd), (evidence sufficient where Appellant read and signed a similar "Waiver of Constitutional Rights, Agreement to Stipulate, and Judicial Confession stating `I understand the above allegations and I confess they are true"'), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 906 , 125 S.Ct. 1603 , 161 L.Ed.2d 280 (2005).

discussed Cited "see" MacImage of Maine, LLC v. Androscoggin County Corp., 2002 ME 2, ¶ 16 , 787 A.2d 144 ; see Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v. Town of Kittery, 2004 ME 65, ¶ 20 , 856 A.2d 1183 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 906 , 125 S.Ct. 1603 , 161 L.Ed.2d 279 (2005); see also Sinclair v. Sinclair, 654 A.2d 438, 439-40 (Me.1995) (holding that legislative intent — not a classification of legislation as procedural or substantive— determines the applicability of new legislation to a pending claim); Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 639 A.2d 626, 628-29 (Me.1994) (distinguishing between the application of section 302 to pending claims and the application of the p…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Withers v. Eharmony, Inc. Rule 26(c) provides that “[t]he court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense ... [by] forbidding inquiry into certain matters, or limiting the scope of disclosure or discovery to certain matters[.]” Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1)(D); see also Rivera v. NIB-CO, Inc., 364 F.3d 1057 , 1063 (9th Cir.2004) (“After a showing of good cause, the district court may issue any protective order ... ‘to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense,’ including a…