Gonzales-Velasquez v. United States, 543 U.S. 968 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Gonzales-Velasquez v. United States, 543 U.S. 968 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“gbl is one of the substances that the statute actually identifies as a potential controlled substance analogue.”
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Boultinghouse v. Hall (cacd, 2008-10-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Boultinghouse v. Hall
C.D. Cal. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
gbl is one of the substances that the statute actually identifies as a potential controlled substance analogue.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Carpenter
1st Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Sabetta, 373 F.3d 75, 80 (1st Cir.) (“A district court must use extreme caution in answering questions from juries so as not to usurp the jury’s fact finding role.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 433 , 160 L.Ed.2d 338 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gonzales-Velasquez
v.
United States Damian-Garcia v. United States Oliva-Banegas v. United States Gonzalez-Jimenez v. United States Aguilera-Guerrero, AKA Rangel v. United States Banegas-Sanchez v. United States and Rangel-Rendon v. United States
04-6397.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 2004.
543 U.S. 968
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)

543 U.S. 968

GONZALES-VELASQUEZ
v.
UNITED STATES;
DAMIAN-GARCIA
v.
UNITED STATES;
OLIVA-BANEGAS
v.
UNITED STATES;
GONZALEZ-JIMENEZ
v.
UNITED STATES;
AGUILERA-GUERRERO, AKA RANGEL
v.
UNITED STATES;
BANEGAS-SANCHEZ
v.
UNITED STATES; and
RANGEL-RENDON
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 04-6397.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 1, 2004.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 465 (second judgment) and 546 (fifth judgment); 102 Fed. Appx. 851 (first judgment); 104 Fed. Appx. 1000 (third judgment); 105 Fed. Appx. 637 (seventh judgment); 108 Fed. Appx. 879 (fourth judgment) and 880 (sixth judgment).