discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rosky v. Baker Respondents 26 have quoted a decision of the court of appeals that clarifies the issue: 27 As the Eleventh Circuit has explained, "Section 2254 presumes that federal courts already have the authority to issue the writ of habeas corpus to a state prisoner. . . . 28 [I]t is not itself a grant of habeas authority, let alone a discrete and independent 1 source of post-conviction relief." Medberry v. Crosby, 351 F.3d 1049, 1059-60 (11th Cir.2003); see also id. at 1056-58 (explaining the evolution of § 2254). 2 Instead, it is § 2241 that provides generally for the granting of writs of habeas corpu…