green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Woodford
See Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005); Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., 819 F.2d 935, 937 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Crawford
Lethal injection itself "is commonly thought to be the most humane form of execution." Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292, 306 (Tenn.2005), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1074 (9th Cir.) (specifically noting that humane concerns were a motivation for adopting lethal injection as the presumptive method of execution in California), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Taylor v. Larry Crawford etc.
Lethal injection itself “is commonly thought to be the most humane form of execution.” Abdur’Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292, 306 (Tenn.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1074 (9th Cir.) (specifically noting that humane concerns were a motivation for adopting lethal injection as the presumptive method of execution in California), cer t. denied, 543 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bieghler v. State
See, eg., Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1076 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005); Cooper v. Rimmer, 379 F.3d 1029, 1031-83 (9th Cir.2004); Reid v. Johnson, 388 F.Supp.2d 548, 552-58 (E.D.Va.2004); State v. Webb, 252 Conn. 128 , 750 A.2d 448, 454-56 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 885 , 121 S.Ct. 98 , 148 L.Ed.2d 53 (2000); Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 666-68 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1188 , 120 S.Ct. 12833 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1122 (2000); Morrow v. State, 21 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Mo.2000), cert. denied 531 U.S. 1171 , 121 S.Ct. 1140 , 148 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mid-Con Freight Systems, Inc.
v.
Michigan Public Service Commission
v.
Michigan Public Service Commission
03-1234.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 2005.
Published
MID-CON FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.
v.
MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.
No. 03-1234.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 21, 2005.
1
Ct. App. Mich. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1086.] Orders granting petitions for writs of certiorari amended to read as follows: "Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: 1. `Whether the $100 fee upon vehicles conducting intrastate operations violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.' 2. `Whether the $100 fee upon vehicles operating solely in interstate commerce is preempted by 49 U. S. C. § 14504.' Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument."