green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hess
(2×)
See United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F. 3d 353, 363 (7th Cir.2005) (explaining that if the court "does not accept the sentencing agreement in its entirety, the defendant must be allowed to withdraw her guilty plea [as] the court does not have the power to retain the plea and discard the agreed-upon sentence"), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1097 , 126 S.Ct. 1021 , 163 L.Ed. 2d 866 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bp Products North America Inc.
See United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 363 (7th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1097 , 126 S.Ct. 1021 , 163 L.Ed.2d 866 (2006) (holding that the sentence imposed under a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement “must comply with the maximum (and minimum, if there is one) provided by the statute of conviction”); see also United States v. Greatwalker, 285 F.3d 727, 730 (8th Cir.2002) (“Even when a defendant, prosecutor, and court agree on a sentence, the court cannot give the sentence effect if it is not authorized by law.”); United States v. Gibson, 356 F.3d 761, 766 (7th Cir.2004) (q…
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilbert, Alex G. v. Merchant, Jay
See United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 360 (7th Cir. 2005) (“When the claim of ineffective assis- tance is based on counsel’s failure to present a motion to suppress, we have required that a defendant prove the motion was meritorious.”) (coll. cases), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1021 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alex Gilbert v. Jay M. Merchant, Warden
See United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 360 (7th Cir.2005) (“When the claim of ineffective assistance is based on counsel’s failure to present a motion to suppress, we have required that a defendant prove the motion was meritorious.”) (coll, cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1021 , 163 L.Ed.2d 866 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
TERENCE M. HAIGNEY VS. U-HAUL CO. OF NEW JERSEY, INC.,ET AL.(L-3542-14, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Super. 370, 376 (App. Div. 2010); see also Metromedia Energy, Inc. v. Enserch Energy Servs., 409 F.3d 574 , 578 (3d Cir. 2005) (applying the de novo standard of review to an arbitration award), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1089 , 126 S. Ct. 1021 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Julian C. Bethel v. United States
See also United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 358-59 (7th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 126 S.Ct. 1021 , 163 L.Ed.2d 866 (2006) (to prove inadequate performance, a defendant must show that counsel did not attempt to learn the facts of the case and failed to make a good-faith estimate of a likely sentence); United States v. Martinez, 169 F.3d 1049, 1053 (7th Cir.1999) (to provide effective assistance of counsel in a guilty plea, counsel must attempt to learn the facts of the case and make a good-faith estimate of a likely sentence); United States v. Barnes, 83 F.3d 934, 939 (7th C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bethel, Julian C. v. United States
See also United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 358-59 (7th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1021 (2006) (to prove inadequate perfor- mance, a defendant must show that counsel did not attempt to learn the facts of the case and failed to make a good-faith estimate of a likely sentence); United States v. Martinez, 169 F.3d 1049, 1053 (7th Cir. 1999) (to provide effective assistance of counsel in a guilty plea, counsel must attempt to learn the facts of the case and make a good-faith estimate of a likely sentence); United States v. Barnes, 83 F.3d 934, 939 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Camarena
v.
Slade, Warden
v.
Slade, Warden
No. 05-6020.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2006.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.