Hansen v. United States, 546 U.S. 1121 (2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Hansen v. United States, 546 U.S. 1121 (2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Leon v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2019-04-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Leon v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thomas , 417 F.3d 1053 , 1056-59 (9th Cir. 2005) ( Cronic did not apply where defense counsel's strategy was to concede guilt for one criminal charge without consultation or consent of defendant in order to enhance counsel's credibility for other counts where evidence was not as strong and punishment was significantly greater), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1121 , 126 S.Ct. 1095 , 163 L.Ed.2d 909 (2006) ; see also Bell v. Cone , supra, 535 U.S. at 696 -97 , 122 S.Ct. 1843 (defense attorney must entirely fail to test prosecutor's case for Cronic rule to apply).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Reynaldo Razo-Guerra
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Alvarado-Rivera, 412 F.3d 942 , 947-48 (8th Cir. 2005) (en banc) (rejecting a claim that the government has the burden to come forward with additional evidence in a safety valve challenge if the government finds a defendant's proffer inadequate), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1121 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Razo-Guerra
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Alvarado-Rivera, 412 F.3d 942 , 947-48 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc) (rejecting a claim that the government has the burden to come forward with additional evidence in a safety valve challenge if the government finds a defendant’s proffer inadequate), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1121 , 126 S.Ct. 1096 , 163 L.Ed.2d 909 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davis v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 922 (2013); see also United States v. Thomas, 417 F.3d 1053, 1057 (9th Cir. 2005) (counsel conceded guilt on one charge on which evidence was overwhelming to gain credibility for defending against more serious charges with greater penalties), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1121 , 126 S. Ct. 1095 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Edgar v. State
Kan. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 417 F.3d 1053, 1057-59 (9th Cir. 2005), cert. denied 546 U.S. 1121 (2006) (applying Nixon and holding Strickland, not Cronic, controlled even though counsel conceded guilt to one of two robbery counts because concession did not abandon all meaningful adversarial testing of the prosecution’s case); Com. v. Cousin, 585 Pa. 287, 301-08 , 888 A.2d 710 (2005) (although defense counsel conceded guilt to criminal homicide, counsel argued against more severe murder charge; there was not a complete failure to subject the prosecution’s case to adversarial testing …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hansen
v.
United States
No. 05-7793.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2006.
546 U.S. 1121
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.