green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Studebaker v. Uribe
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects a criminal defendant from conviction “except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.” In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1073 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970); accord Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274 (9th Cir.2005, as amended July 8, 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1137 , 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 , and cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1137 , 126 S.Ct. 1145 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Oliva v. Hedgpeth
See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274-75 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1137 , 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramirez v. Almager
See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274-75 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1137 , 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 1145, 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herrera
See United States v. Ebersole, 411 F.3d 517, 526 (4th Cir.2005) (stating standard of review), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1003 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelley
See United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos, 412 F.3d 572, 577 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Shirley Ree Smith v. Gwendolyn Mitchell, Warden
See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262,1269-70 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 126 S.Ct. 1142 , - L.Ed.2d -,-(2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LAVEA v. Woodard
Id.; see, e.g., Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1278-79 (9th Cir.2005), ce rt. denied, 546 U.S. 1137 , 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006) (granting writ where, after resolving all conflicting factual inferences in favor of prosecution, only speculation supported petitioner’s conviction for first degree murder under a theory of aiding and abetting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez
(2×)
See United States v. Brady, 579 F.2d 1121, 1131 (9th Cir.1978) (upholding instructions that concluded with the language, "unless and until outweighed by evidence in the case to the contrary, the law presumes that a person is innocent of crime or wrong"); see also Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1279 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1137 , 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006), and 546 U.S. 1137 , 126 S.Ct. 1145 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez
See United States v. Brady, 579 F.2d 1121, 1131 (9th Cir. 1978) (upholding instructions that concluded with the language, “unless and until outweighed by evidence in the case to the contrary, the law presumes that a person is inno- cent of crime or wrong”); see also Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1279 (9th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S.Ct. 1142 (2006), and 126 S.Ct. 1145 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez
See United States v. Brady, 579 F.2d 1121, 1131 (9th Cir. 1978) (upholding instructions that concluded with the language, “unless and until outweighed by evidence in the case to the contrary, the law presumes that a person is inno- cent of crime or wrong”); see also Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1279 (9th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S.Ct. 1142 (2006), and 126 S.Ct. 1145 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jorge Enrique Lopez
See United States v. Brady, 579 F.2d 1121, 1131 (9th Cir.1978) (upholding instructions which concluded with the language, “unless and until outweighed by evidence in the case to the contrary, the law presumes that a person is innocent of crime or wrong”); see also Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1279 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1142 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006), and — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1145 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez
See United States v. Brady, 579 F.2d 1121, 1131 (9th Cir. 1978) (upholding instructions which concluded with the language, “unless and until outweighed by evidence in the case to the contrary, the law presumes that a person is inno- cent of crime or wrong”); see also Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1279 (9th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S.Ct. 1142 (2006), and 126 S.Ct. 1145 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Virgilio, Personal Representative of Virgilio
v.
City of New York, New York
v.
City of New York, New York
No. 05-488.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 2006.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Henry J. Hyde et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.