green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Griswold
(See Perry Ed. Assn., 460 US at 45 ; Loper, 999 F2d at 703.) The principal inquiry for determining whether a law is content based is “whether the government has adopted a regulation of speech because of disagreement with the message it conveys.” (Ward v Rock Against Racism, 491 US 781, 791 [1989]; see Hobbs v County of Westchester, 397 F3d 133, 149 [2d Cir 2005], cert denied 546 US —, 126 S Ct 340 [2005].) Rochester’s Aggressive Panhandling Act bars any “person on a sidewalk or alongside a roadway” from “soliciting] from any occupant of a motor vehicle that is on a street or othe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Boulton v. Christopher Swanson
See also Graham v. City of Mentor, 118 Fed.Appx. 27, 31 (6th Cir.2004) (upholding the constitutionality of a similar police code against facial and as-applied challenges), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 815 , 126 S.Ct. 340 , 163 L.Ed.2d 51 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Winke
v.
Winke
v.
Winke
No. 04-1509.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
Published
Ct. App. Iowa. Certiorari denied.